Oh so he was backing me up? Sorry Pannick in that case.Yeah, think you've misread that.
Oh so he was backing me up? Sorry Pannick in that case.Yeah, think you've misread that.
Ain't you the one suggesting like 200m for Haaland is a no brainer?100M WTAF!
No,he played for a point and got fuck all.Did they have a shot on target that night? :)
The thing is we have accumulated more champions league money than any of them over the last 10 years so we can quite rightly spend more. Don’t forget the years of the old top 4 outspending the rest of the league ten-fold.Over the last 5 years, a subset of City fans have defended our spending by clinging on to the fact our record transfer is below United's (£89), Liverpool's (£75m), and even Arsenal's (£80m).
I have told people using that line in these threads over the past few years that it's not something to hang on to, because we will spend big eventually.
Now that day is upon us, a few are struggling to let go. Trevor Sinclair was at it last week saying we should buy Tammy Abraham instead of Kane because City don't do big transfers. Not surprised Cheeseman is another.
I'd love for him to specify what the 1 reason is though? He's clearly alluding to money, which is pathetic, because I think both have openly said CL football and trophies are their biggest motivators.
He‘ll want 10 though. Be interesting to see if he gets it.Give him 18 like Barry and Delph
MessiWhat will be interesting is which number Grealish gets if does sign.
If the number 10 is boxed off, the likelihood of Kane will be much greater.
He might not get a squad number for as long as possible and take 10 if we can’t get Kane.