Centurions
Well-Known Member
Not reading his post history, he's a 'straight to the ignore list' poster for sure.Whoosh?
Not reading his post history, he's a 'straight to the ignore list' poster for sure.Whoosh?
And in the real world Grealish is massively over rated and over priced. We have better players in his position. The priority is supposed to be a striker but paying this much suggests he will be our only buy.On FIFA?
This is the real world, for fuck's sake!
Birmingham City should retire the number #10 for Grealish..Trawling the other Birmingham forums to see how they see this business , I came across this on the Birmingham City main forum (Small Heath Alliance). Made me laugh. Also reminded me of the kind of gallows humour that typified us not so very long ago.
This is the most exciting part of the season for Blues fans.
We are nearing the summit.
If you're spending 9 figures on a player he should be one of the inaugural names on the team sheet. Not a utility player. This would be a daft signing. He's technically not as good as a Foden or Bernardo. He scores goals, he can pick a pass. He isn't very quick. He's marketable and has the personality that will garner huge amounts of press. He reminds me of a very raw Lampard, but can he reach those lofty heights? Is he an improvement on what City already has? Not for me. Would the fee be worthwhile? Depends how you define what ''success'' is. Save the 100m and put it towards Kane.
I think some are taking into account the 'Pep' factor too much on this one. This reminds me of a mid/late 00's City signing. Gareth Barry tier.
Or David silva in today’s market . How old was Dave when we signed him ??? 23 ??How much do you reckon KDB would be now at 25?