Jack Grealish

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I do think we're in heavy for Haaland, it's just after him the backup options (Kane or Lukaku) seem very difficult to get, and then after those two the quality drop off is too great in all the other available goal scorers and I don't think it's in the club's MO to sign a guy for the sake of filling in a position.
Except that isn’t true. After yesterday’s news, you can count on the club signing AT LEAST ONE striker. Even if we have a list of ten names and they all don’t work out, we would still have to find another name and bring in. You can’t have one striker in your squad, that “striker” being Jesus lmao. A position has to be filled even if it’s by... Danny Ings lol. However, if it were up to me, I would sign two strikers, just as last summer I was saying we should be signing one
 
And don't forget Messi and a left back -)
The Messi situation isn’t in the to-do list. It’s more like “if the opportunity presents itself, we will make a move”, but if it doesn’t, we carry on with the plans the same way. And yes, the left back too — another one that should have gotten done last summer hehe
 
Jesus, this fetishizing of the false 9 again... “Jesus or false 9” isn’t a strategy lol. Please stop.

also, it’s not Haaland OR Grealish, it’s both
Even Everton’s manager grasped the fact quicker than some of our own fans that false 9 is just one of many options and effective ways of playing City have in our locker, rather than being the norm
 
Except that isn’t true. After yesterday’s news, you can count on the club signing AT LEAST ONE striker. Even if we have a list of ten names and they all don’t work out, we would still have to find another name and bring in. You can’t have one striker in your squad, that “striker” being Jesus lmao. A position has to be filled even if it’s by... Danny Ings lol. However, if it were up to me, I would sign two strikers, just as last summer I was saying we should be signing one

We could sign Messi on a free and play him false 9.

If Dortmund and Spurs both hold out for £150m then that is a much more likely option imo.

And you would sell Jesus and bring in two strikers, why? Or do you want 3 players for one position?
 
Even Everton’s manager grasped the fact quicker than some of our own fans that false 9 is just one of many options and effective ways of playing City have in our locker, rather than being the norm
Yes. I would like to recommend some people books and articles on “total football” and how strikers are crucial in that theory lol
 
Except that isn’t true. After yesterday’s news, you can count on the club signing AT LEAST ONE striker. Even if we have a list of ten names and they all don’t work out, we would still have to find another name and bring in. You can’t have one striker in your squad, that “striker” being Jesus lmao. A position has to be filled even if it’s by... Danny Ings lol. However, if it were up to me, I would sign two strikers, just as last summer I was saying we should be signing one
Would one of those strikers have a perfect body like Lukaku??
 
We could sign Messi on a free and play him false 9.

If Dortmund and Spurs both hold out for £150m then that is a much more likely option imo.

And you would sell Jesus and bring in two strikers, why? Or do you want 3 players for one position?
There’s only so many times a day I can reply to this craziness about false nines, I’m sorry. 34 year old Messi being played as a false 9 in some games has no effect in the striker. There is no chance in hell that Pep would bring in a player to “fill in a false 9 position” without a proper striker therefore announcing to the world and making your game wildly predictable. He may be a crazy genius but he isn’t crazy stupid
 
We could sign Messi on a free and play him false 9.

If Dortmund and Spurs both hold out for £150m then that is a much more likely option imo.

And you would sell Jesus and bring in two strikers, why? Or do you want 3 players for one position?
Yeah 3 strikers for a 1 striker team seems a waste. We only need the one striker on top of what we have really.
 
The Messi situation isn’t in the to-do list. It’s more like “if the opportunity presents itself, we will make a move”, but if it doesn’t, we carry on with the plans the same way. And yes, the left back too — another one that should have gotten done last summer hehe

The truth is;
We do not know who the targets are.
Coronavirus has had a massive impact on all clubs finances.
Some folk like to think they know.
The transfer forum is littered with false prophets, Ezzy is my favourite.
 
The truth is;
We do not know who the targets are.
Coronavirus has had a massive impact on all clubs finances.
Some folk like to think they know.
The transfer forum is littered with false prophets, Ezzy is my favourite.
Ezzy had so much certainty too in his postings. I always wonder if he knew someone that claimed to be ITK that he went all in on or if he was just that convincing at making stuff up. If he were here now he'd be telling us that Grealish isn't on the cards as we're after some unknown 17 year old Italian player.
 
The truth is;
We do not know who the targets are.
There are ways of reading the clues in the media and seeing who’s credible and who’s not and therefore knowing who we are after and who we’re not. This is true for this summer just as it was true every other summer.
But that we will sign a striker is not about knowing who the targets are. It is now the #1 priority in our to-do list in the summer
 
Ezzy had so much certainty too in his postings. I always wonder if he knew someone that claimed to be ITK that he went all in on or if he was just that convincing at making stuff up. If he were here now he'd be telling us that Grealish isn't on the cards as we're after some unknown 17 year old Italian player.
An unknown Italian player you say
 
That might be true because of circumstances but not because of his qualities.

also, if you have an issue with me and will only be snarky to me, you should instead hit the Ignore button and never read my posts again. Better for your blood pressure
Mate, I’m cold as ice, don’t you worry...

I just don’t like this matter of fact attitude you have, also a little sceptical where it stems from... you’ve clarified you aren’t a ‘young buck’ yet post as such, that’s fine as well, however, when a grown arsed man is telling people a guy is fit because his picture presents as such, then alarm bells are ringing....

Anyway, debate is healthy, why would one choose to ignore....

Choosing your choice of words however, that’s a different story,!
 
however, when a grown arsed man is telling people a guy is fit because his picture presents as such, then alarm bells are ringing....
You seem stuck at that one comment I made days ago. People kept referring to Lukaku as big and fat. He does have a large face but he’s incredibly fit as shown by any stats you look at including his speed. I was resorting to the picture as an example. Easier than asking people to watch an Inter game when they clearly haven’t...
 
You seem stuck at that one comment I made days ago. People kept referring to Lukaku as big and fat. He does have a large face but he’s incredibly fit as shown by any stats you look at including his speed. I was resorting to the picture as an example. Easier than asking people to watch an Inter game when they clearly haven’t...
Have you watched him live? In the flesh?

Not sure if the term will translate the beaches of the Copacabana but he has the touch of a rapist...

Aesthetics mean feck all in terms of fitness and you were insinuating as much... word to the wise, accept differences of opinion, it’s what makes the world tick when applied right..

Anyway, time consuming this, Grealish is shit, along with Rice and Lukaku (:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top