Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Tim of the Oak said:ColinLee said:Sorry but I don't get that bit, where did we say we'll introduce young players before they're actually good enough?Tim of the Oak said:The media don't focus on the nice stuff because it doesn't sell as many papers. Rodwell / his advisors have been about long enough to know the media would use Jack's lack of game of time against us and the lad was hardly going to remind the press of his injuries.
It is a shame that Jack wasn't fitter because we may never know if he was good enough for our first team. If Jack was fit in the last 12 months then it was too late as we had bought reinforcements (to the point where we could let Barry go out on loan).
That said Our Club is not behind the wall in trying to use the media as evidenced by our misleading "holistic" claims. Hopefully playing the same system through the age groups will help players to develop but we are years away from an homegrown English player getting a run in the team.
And for everyone getting their panties in a twist over this thread try reading the actual article rather than the headline. In fact try a little game called spot the quote, believe me you'll struggle.
Sly ran a similar one where the caption is "Rodwell glad to be out of City" and the headline is "Premier League: Sunderland's Jack Rodwell glad Manchester City career is over". Nowhere in the article does he say any such thing. Media are scum, get over it.
I read the whole article Cin and I wasn't taken in by the headline. However, the priority for Roswell and his people was to get across the message that he wasn't injury prone. Inevitably, this line from the Rodwell's would give the media an open goal to have a pop at us. No surprise there then!
No we won't introduce young English players if they are not good enough and article's like the Mirror push this back further. As a Club, I am afraid we could do better than:
(A) not produce a single homegrown English Ayer in the last 5 years.
(B) Sell our best young prospect of the last decade - Daniel Sturridge - who claims he wanted to leave due to lack of first team opportunies.
(C) Replace Jack Rodwell (who I agree was ready for a move) with Bruno Zuc.
I am loving the trophies and being Champions but anyone taken in by the "holistic" press release needs to go back to school. The new Academy looks great but the current best youth production line in Europe, at Feyenord,barely have two coins to scratch together.
City are absolutely serious about the academy project. It's those who expect it to have happened already when it hasn't even opened yet who need to go back to school. And Sturridge is full of shit like Rodwell. You don't leave a team where you are competing with Ched Evans for a future first team spot, to compete with fucking Drogba.
If he was leaving to get games, he would have gone to Birmingham or similar, not Chelsea. He is a complete liar.