rapidCT
Well-Known Member
Because Navas was playing as a winger his hole career and, from what I see, Sancho is a winger as well.So then why draw a false equivalence. Navas has nothing to do with Sancho.
Because Navas was playing as a winger his hole career and, from what I see, Sancho is a winger as well.So then why draw a false equivalence. Navas has nothing to do with Sancho.
So then why draw a false equivalence. Navas has nothing to do with Sancho.
Aside from the fact that Navas has played in the same position as Sancho plays for nearly every he has game he has played for us apart from the last three. Yep no point in comparing them at all.
Oh really? Because I've never once seen Sancho play on the right, nor Navas on the left. I guess I must have missed it.
I think you will find they are both wingers a small point you seemingly ignored in your desparate attempts to try and put down yet another reasoned poster who dared to even state that in his opinion he preferred watching one of our youth players over one of Peps preferred players.
Given his minutes played this season, I'd hardly describe him as a preferred player.he preferred watching one of our youth players over one of Peps preferred players.
Then why is Ryan Sessegnon playing at 16 for Fulham? When you have a talent you explore him.Sancho is still too young to be regularly involved in the first team, also consider he hasn't played a full season of EDS yet.
Probably his trajectory should be something like this:
1) Next season he is 17 (and a half), should play full EDS and given the odd first team game against easier opposition (maybe like 2-3 like Woodburn gets)
2) Season after he will be 18 (and a half), should be integrated into team as a squad player, no more EDS, getting atleast 10 games in some capacity
3) Season after he will be 19 (and a half), has to battle for starting spot over other wingers, will be a squad player and should get atleast 15 games, has to push to be better or as good as Sane, Sterling, Roberts etc.