Didn't he go on strike or Awol as we wanted to take him on tour. No mention of that in the BBC report
Assuming you're a grown adult, I actually feel embarrassed for you for this post.
lets have it right here please he is a big head and a know it all and at his age thinks he can walk into the first team or demand a place????
You're literally just making things up now.
And if he's overhyped and not ready for the first team squad, why on Earth are you bothered about him leaving?
Well he was starting matches for Dortmund before his injury, which suggests that he is making some sort of impact. He's played more minutes in the league this season than Foden and Brahim combined..
And it does take an element of belief and bravery for a 17 year old to turn down £30k a week to go and ply his trade in a new country where he doesn't speak the language..
It's funny how nobody had an issue when he left Watford to join City for (presumably) more money. Or nobody has an issue when the likes of Lorenzo Gonzales, Nabil Touaizi and Benjamin Garre leave their clubs to join City.
Yeah this. Sometimes I think people forget this when they talk about Foden in particular. Not that he's not a talent, but normally for an u-18 player to be playing senior football frequently and regularly they have to be ahead of the rest in terms of physical development some way or another (Rooney, Sterling, Lukaku, Mbappe, Kompany etc). Either that or they're Messi. Most top youngsters don't get game time until they're at least 19. KDB didn't play regularly in Belgium until then and David Silva didn't get regular games until 20. They did obviously get time and games when they were younger but not at the level of a top of the tree PL club (or similar).There's no way a 17 year old kid is going to get any serious game time in the EPL at whatever club you can name. Maybe Sterling was an anomaly but it isn't likely to ever happen again. Maybe a mid-table club with nothing to play for at the back end of a season could do a 20 minute intro, but that's about it.
Only because the best ones are out on loan playing regularly.City are a bit weird in that there aren't any 19-21 year olds on the periphery in the way but the point is the same.
Forgot about that for some reason haha.Only because the best ones are out on loan playing regularly.
Personally I think Foden might be the exception (there are always one or two, and he has the extra motivation of being a blue), but the biggest reason is not about ability, they're just not men yet, and by 19/20 they may have grown enough to be considered regularly, or they have worked out how to avoid the thugs. I think our loans are generally good for their development individually, even if they don't make it here eventually.
Sturridge and Etuhu are two players who spring to mind who left too early because either they or their agents had an inflated sense of self importance
Sturridge looked much better than Sancho did when he was in our youth team. He looked a real talent. I am not convinced by Sancho despite all the hype.Sturridge and Etuhu are two players who spring to mind who left too early because either they or their agents had an inflated sense of self importance
Any reasoning given as to why he’s controversial?Has just been named on a list of 'controversial players' by Kicker, who may be moved on by Dortmund.