Give any manager in the world huge, huge funds, and they'll spend always. Pep has done this at City and filled his squad with absolutely shit loads of senior pros, quality in every position. This has lead to chances for the younger lads being less likely - it doesn't mean that he thinks playing the kids is a bad idea, it means that he's taking the easier hand, and who fucking blames him? I certainly don't, and I don't blame fans who prefer that either. He's fantastic and he's the best in the world at dealing with a squad that good. Just look how good we are. It definitely works.
However, I think he's also the best coach in the world at dealing with young talent, and I think it'd be a shame if he didn't leave something of a legacy on that front at City too. It's a personal preference, yeah, but I think that's fair enough. We have it really easy, given our funds, and £60m signings to me get a little boring. It's like playing a game on cheat mode. I love it, defo, cos we're class, but I tend to think it means even more when you win with a few of your own. That buzz you get when a local lad like Foden steps on the pitch. It's ten times more than when Mahrez does. Undeniably. Cos there's a connection. It's real. Personally, I love that.
There is no doubt that it'd be one huge less stick to beat us with too if Foden comes through and becomes a star. Add another 2/3 around that before Pep has gone, and that's a legacy. In the way that Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and the rest of the La Masia clan did for Barca. That bond is stronger with the club and the fans and I think it'd actually leave us in a better shape for a post Pep world as well.
Pep's simply not had to develop young talent at City given the quality squad we've allowed him to build. That doesn't mean he thinks young lads are an impossible risk though. They're not... once again, I don't blame him for taking that choice, but that choice doesn't mean that the other way is wrong too. I personally think both approaches can co-exist quite happily, and I think it'd be nice sometimes if we didn't take the easy £60m choice and made a lad like Sancho 5th choice, instead of 6th choice. It'd be quite exciting, IMO. And ya never know, it could save us a shit load of money, or as domalino said, a few sub appearances here and there for promising starlets could hugely increase their fee, or even make themselves a surprise part of the squad by having a blinder. Win win.