Maybe but signing either will do me.Think Wirtz is a better fit for us.
Can't see it. I would be in favour of it, but it feels like the club is against spending 100m+. I hope I am wrong, though.What about £115 million
I don’t believe they are against it Haaland94.Can't see it. I would be in favour of it, but it feels like the club is against spending 100m+. I hope I am wrong, though.
I wouldn’t want us to put that kind of money in Bayern’s pockets. If he wants to come here pull a Madrid and tell him to keep running his contract down and either buy him for a much smaller fee or even a free.Can't see it. I would be in favour of it, but it feels like the club is against spending 100m+. I hope I am wrong, though.
If he becomes available it wouldn't exceed the grealish transfer fee. If he doesn't become available and we really,really want him, then it exceeds...I don’t believe they are against it Haaland94.
The player will just have to be considered very special for them to do it. Check my previous comment about Wirtz being Citys number one target.
If he was to become available this summer we would be breaking the Grealish transfer fee on him.
Fuck it sign em both £200m we'll be set for yearsMaybe but signing either will do me.
The reporting suggests he is waiting to see what Bayern offers from a money and sporting perspective (plan to win a Champions Lesgue). City is lurking if he comes away not pleased. He holds the cards not Bayern as his contract continues to run down.If he is available and wants to come here then City will spend the money, as it stands he isn't and why would Bayern sell their best player.