itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,331
Based on how things have been the last few years, if City really rate a player they want them sticking around as much as possible. Whether we agree with it or not, the path for the players the club is highest on seems to be slow integration into the first team, with exposure to Pep and the squad being the best course of training. Going on loan (or to another club with a buyback) is probably seen as less than optimal in the club's eyes. Being loaned out seems to be more a thing that's for players part of the academy 'farm' rather than potential first teamers (mostly).
The way McAtee has developed I'd guess the club think at this point in time it's best for him to follow the path of a potential first teamer, which the player himself by the sounds of it doesn't agree with, or maybe he just wants a faster route into the senior game.
As to why City didn't just 'cut their losses' and sell him to Brighton when they could have done, I'll assume they thought they could (and may still) get McAtee to stay.
Ideally the club wants to keep him (despite us seemingly being the only team adverse to the loan route) but in a situation where you're having a difficult negotiation with a young player that probably doesn't want the slow integration to first team football, it's ludicrous to let his deal run down while trying to persuade him. We're still in a strong position regarding his future with just less than 2 years left but City need to make a decision relatively quickly here so we don't end up with egg on our faces in a few years time.