BillyShears
Well-Known Member
tolmie's hairdoo said:Mister Appointment said:hgblue said:Overrated? Nah, I'd say those who think they know football but don't, seriously underrate him, because they can't see passed the cliche.
As has been said countless times. He's not as bad as some would have you believe, and he's not as good as others would have you believe. He's a very good player but neither world class nor rubbish.
I'm guessing that Mancini and Pellegrini are two people included in the "think they know football but don't" cliche ;)
Horses for courses.
He's good enough for our squad and he should feel privileged by that.
Real Madrid, Barca, Paris, Bayern, Chelsea, all have squads who possess different shades of quality.
Milner is a very good player and deserves to stake his claim, but it's all downhill after City.
He's a very lucky lad in that he has won all these medals, because he certainly wouldn't have got them anywhere else.
I take him over Nasri maybe six times out of ten, but I also recognise that when Nasri is performing in those other four games, the technical quality is there for all to see.
I agree with most of that. I think in any top squad where you have competing players finding the perfect equilibrium can be tricky and inevitably at various points different players are unhappy. The most important thing IMO is to have a manager who picks player on their form/ability rather than on reputation, because in doing that they do what's best for the team rather than for any individual.
Seems you can't talk about Milner without talking about Nasri and vice versa which in a way is a shame because they both have roles to play within the squad and they are both very important players for us. If anything they should both fear the club signing someone who usurps the pair of them.