Manc in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 8,494
chesterbells said:Manc in London said:No brainer, IMO. He will be useful well into his 30s as he is as fit as a fiddle. Plus we will be able to get a fee if we sell him.
Do you think he has the talent to be in the first XI of a champions league winning team? Is he that good? Cos if you take at face value his desire for a regular starting place in the next few years, that's what we'd have to be talking. I like him a lot, but I'm not convinced he is.
If Simon Mullock is right, in that the issue is the length of contract, then it does not matter. He's an excellent squad player. Let's not forget that we need to fulfill our obligations in relation to the HG quota. If our juniors are not good enough, then we have to pay well over the odds for a HG player from another club. I cannot think of a single HG player who would realistically be available and get into our first XI. Any HG player is likely to be a squad player at best. A very expensive squad player. It therefore makes sense to extend his contract.