You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Joe Hart (continued)
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
Targetblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 385
+2EL APACHE TEVEZ said:+ 1Davs 19 said:FantasyIreland said:I want to see him back for Spuds,he's better than Panti.
By a distance.
Davs 19
Well-Known Member
kenzie115 said:grim up north said:kenzie115 said:He has, because he's had saves to make, and that's what he's good at. However, when he plays for us he doesn't face that many shots but we need his decision making to be on the money, which tonight has again shown, it is not.
One error didn't cost a goal, again let down by his defenders
It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Wow. Just wow.....I'm sure we all bow to your superior knowledge....30 odd years of watching City and playing ithe game at a half decent level for a few years was all to naught.....
grim up north
Well-Known Member
kenzie115 said:grim up north said:kenzie115 said:He has, because he's had saves to make, and that's what he's good at. However, when he plays for us he doesn't face that many shots but we need his decision making to be on the money, which tonight has again shown, it is not.
One error didn't cost a goal, again let down by his defenders
It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Ok
Lucky Toma
Well-Known Member
kenzie115 said:Davs 19 said:kenzie115 said:Blue or not there was no need for him to come for that ball, at best he could have done no more than Smalling would have done, at worst he could have cost a goal.
As I said, he's always been a great shot stopper, but we need more than that so it's the other parts of his game that need to improve.
As I said, opinions. I think the lads had a top game.....
He has, because he's had saves to make, and that's what he's good at. However, when he plays for us he doesn't face that many shots but we need his decision making to be on the money, which tonight has again shown, it is not.
In all the debating over Hart I wish Ric or a mod would fix it so this appears beneath all subsequent posts.
Davs 19 said:kenzie115 said:grim up north said:One error didn't cost a goal, again let down by his defenders
It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Wow. Just wow.....I'm sure we all bow to your superior knowledge....30 odd years of watching City and playing ithe game at a half decent level for a few years was all to naught.....
So you have no fears that he might come rushing out of his goal on Sunday and risk costing us a goal?
djimaldblue said:+2EL APACHE TEVEZ said:+ 1Davs 19 said:By a distance.
+3<br /><br />-- 19 Nov 2013 22:03 --<br /><br />
kenzie115 said:Davs 19 said:kenzie115 said:It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Wow. Just wow.....I'm sure we all bow to your superior knowledge....30 odd years of watching City and playing ithe game at a half decent level for a few years was all to naught.....
So you have no fears that he might come rushing out of his goal on Sunday and risk costing us a goal?
No.
grim up north
Well-Known Member
kenzie115 said:Davs 19 said:kenzie115 said:It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Wow. Just wow.....I'm sure we all bow to your superior knowledge....30 odd years of watching City and playing ithe game at a half decent level for a few years was all to naught.....
So you have no fears that he might come rushing out of his goal on Sunday and risk costing us a goal?
And he might not
Davs 19
Well-Known Member
kenzie115 said:Davs 19 said:kenzie115 said:It doesn't matter that it didn't cost a goal, it could have and if he continues to make the same mistakes, it will do eventually, and it'll be more than likely when he's playing for us.
Anyone who watched him tonight and thinks the problem's solved didn't really understand the problem in the first place.
Wow. Just wow.....I'm sure we all bow to your superior knowledge....30 odd years of watching City and playing ithe game at a half decent level for a few years was all to naught.....
So you have no fears that he might come rushing out of his goal on Sunday and risk costing us a goal?
No more than Cech, De Gea, Begovic, etc.......No keepers perfect but He's a long way better than Pants and those are our two options..........