Joe Hart (joined Torino on season long loan - Official)

Status
Not open for further replies.
blueplan said:
Absolutely and Cogently Expressed.

  • Without football nous and the technical footwork abilities which has to be mastered by any GK at this stage can City afford continuing carrying an overrated, over-hyped GK who was fully exposed at the recent Euros?
  • Do we have the luxury of letting Hart acquire learning on the spot when he has shown and has a proclivity to be Risk Aversed.
  • Has he shown leadership on the field when he let his teammate/s carry the burden of defending his GK turf (especially crosses and from corner kicks ) and letting them being scapegoated for any goals let in?
Can we let Pep and the Club be the Laughing Stock of the World?
Click to expand...
What is the point of trying to be articulate and 'matter of fact' with a post then filling it with bias and opioions trying to pass them off as facts? Are you in fact 12 and just discovered your thesaurus app?
 
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
joe is miles better than willy as a traditional goalkeeper. are you blind :)
Click to expand...
My vision is OK thank you.
Willy is a solid all round keeper. No major weaknesses in his game.
As has been documented by a number of posters on this thread, Joe's game has many aspects where to use management speak there is room for improvement.
So to tell you the truth if they remain as our choice of keepers, I'm not really that arsed whether it's Willy or Joe's name on the team sheet.
 
Len Rum said:
My vision is OK thank you.
Willy is a solid all round keeper. No major weaknesses in his game.
As has been documented by a number of posters on this thread, Joe's game has many aspects where to use management speak there is room for improvement.
So to tell you the truth if they remain as our choice of keepers, I'm not really that arsed whether it's Willy or Joe's name on the team sheet.
Click to expand...
Haha the cup final has wiped the memory of willy and his fuck up's last season,it'll soon come back to you
 
Len Rum said:
My vision is OK thank you.
Willy is a solid all round keeper. No major weaknesses in his game.
As has been documented by a number of posters on this thread, Joe's game has many aspects where to use management speak there is room for improvement.
So to tell you the truth if they remain as our choice of keepers, I'm not really that arsed whether it's Willy or Joe's name on the team sheet.
Click to expand...
I agree with this. Would also add that if willy were playing as often has Joe has, he would be getting a lot more credit than he does.
 
pudge said:
It's not superior though, at a questionable push it would be like being the least fattest kid at fat camp.

It appears it's more Caballero's willingness to distribute the ball differently more so than his ability to do so. On Saturday he did nothing impressive in that regard and in pre season he stunk it up kicking wise.

Hart is the better overall 'keeper between the two; no debate at all, sorry. If they are the two options going into the season after the window closes, would everyone be OK with the lesser of the two playing week in and week out?

Because when Bony played ahead of Iheanacho it wasn't pretty on here.
Click to expand...
I still think the question will be rendered moot by 1st September. But probably not until then.
 
pudge said:
As could Hart.
Click to expand...
If he does as he's told in training yes.

The difference is that Willy was a very decent keeper before but hasn't really showed it at City (due to confidence or I don't know what).

Joe has never been comfortable with ball at feet or being a sweeper keeper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.