Joe Hart or Willy Caballero

[kp789]

Broken finger imminent.

He was a great cricketer at Worcestershire, I would not count on it! He nearly rejected Shrewsbury and went to Kings and play at Worcester on a scholarship, but for some reason he chose Shrewsbury and their college. What an amazing decision it turned out to be.

 

[kp789]

Total silence from the Hart out brigade. Long may it continue.

No, they have taken to criticising Aguero for being a poor finisher...

hart out.

I'll say it again - signing average keepers doesn't make hart any better for having a handful of good games since real Madrid away.

I don't like his attitude and top keepers save more points than hart does - its a fact.

It is not a fact, you are talking absolute rubbish.
Could you please advise me how you are qualified to make such unfounded statements? What credentials do you hold.

Joe Hart is one of the best Keepers that this country has seen since the likes of Seaman and Shilton. He is not yet the finished article, but you are talking as if he is some league 2 goalie. For some reason, you dont like his attitude and all of a sudden he is a crap keeper.

Answer me this, how has he so many individual achievements for such an appallling attitude and 'handful of good games, you dont get 3 golden gloves from. 'a couple of good games'

Here is a list of his individual honours.

Premier League Golden Glove: 2010–11, 2011–12, 2012–13
Premier League PFA Team of the Year: 2009–10, 2011–12
League Two PFA Team of the Year: 2005–06[10]
Birmingham City Player of the Year: 2009–10[30]
Manchester City Performance of the Season: 2010–11[68]
2010–11 FA Cup Player of the Round: Semi-Finals

 

[kippaxchris]

Prefer Hart, but the genuine concern is that having been brought in to increase the pressure on him, Caballero's performances are likely to do the exact opposite. Hart may just as easily become complacent, knowing that there is little squad pressure on him.

Very true. After last night the only debate is whether Willy is an upgrade or a downgrade on Pants.

Debate? Panti is & was much better

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Prefer Hart, but the genuine concern is that having been brought in to increase the pressure on him, Caballero's performances are likely to do the exact opposite. Hart may just as easily become complacent, knowing that there is little squad pressure on him.

Very true. After last night the only debate is whether Willy is an upgrade or a downgrade on Pants.

Debate? Panti is & was much better

Pantilimon was bloody awful. Don't know why he rated so much.

 

[jimharri]

Very true. After last night the only debate is whether Willy is an upgrade or a downgrade on Pants.

Debate? Panti is & was much better

Pantilimon was bloody awful. Don't know why he rated so much.

And Caballero is worse.

 

[J_Bow]

Hard to judge our keepers seriously at this moment when our defence has been abysmal.

 

[blue ranger]

Hart is a far better keeper going off what I've seen so far. I still can't understand why we didn't sign an English gk as back up to hart. What a total waste.

Caballero probably has the edge on distribution but that's about it IMO.

 

[stony]

I think Pellegrini brought in Willy to take Harts place, but Harts form has improved dramatically and he has made sure his position is safe.
I can think of no other reason why the manager would waste a precious foreign player spot.

 

[Wilf Wild 1937]

Debate? Panti is & was much better

Pantilimon was bloody awful. Don't know why he rated so much.

And Caballero is worse.

I rest my case!

 

[Davs 19]

I think Pellegrini brought in Willy to take Harts place, but Harts form has improved dramatically and he has made sure his position is safe.
I can think of no other reason why the manager would waste a precious foreign player spot.

Harts form has become more consistent but I doubt Willy is the reason as he looks shite tbh.

Wonder who our next number 2 will be ?