The contract allows for him to be paid whilst banned from playing? Not even a discretionary withdrawal of pay? - or discretion to continue paying if banned because a player had put taken one for the team?TGR said:They won't because they can't unfortunately. Footballers contracts are 100% watertight. He will get paid also!
pudge said:That's just short of 1/3 of the season, some captain...
GazC said:TGR said:They won't because they can't unfortunately. Footballers contracts are 100% watertight. He will get paid also!
Pretty sure that's a water tight case for gross misconduct.
TGR said:GazC said:TGR said:They won't because they can't unfortunately. Footballers contracts are 100% watertight. He will get paid also!
Pretty sure that's a water tight case for gross misconduct.
yeah... just like Tevez eh? I tell you 100% watertight!
Typical Barton. I heard him on the radio once whingingly defending his indefensible behaviour. He hasn't changed. Plonker deserves to be back in gaol.Barton initially refused to leave the field and took to Twitter to defend his actions before apologising to QPR fans.
In the immediate aftermath of the game, Barton tweeted: "People are forgetting Tevez started the fracas by throwing a punch to the head.
"Can do nothing but apologise to the players and the fans. Still don't think its a sending off."
The following day he tweeted: "Right, enough about yesterday, I apologise to everyone offended by it.
"If that's not enough for some, so be it. Life is too short."
He added: "Things happen on the pitch, in the heat of battle sometimes. Not how we always plan them to happen."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18183661
cavalier Jackson said:It's an insult. If someone from the crowd would have punched him as he came off they'd be looking at a custodial