She’s paid by the club for the vlog that Barton was commenting on?
The vlog that City posted on their own social media channels? I would have thought so, unless the club docked her pay because Joey Barton didn't like it.
She’s paid by the club for the vlog that Barton was commenting on?
Yeah was gonna say, that report is about 15 years old.8:2 men to women apparently.
English
premierskillsenglish.britishcouncil.org
Thought obviously that may have changed from that report.
I edited it with a 2022 report saying 70:30 for tv.Yeah was gonna say, that report is about 15 years old.
Then she needs to get the basics right or she’s leaving herself open to people ridiculing her knowledge. If she’s serious about this being a career at any rate.The vlog that City posted on their own social media channels? I would have thought so, unless the club docked her pay because Joey Barton didn't like it.
Yeah you weren’t too far off tbf and you make a good point. Better than any other I’ve seen so far pushing for female pundits.Haha, found the exact same study as you from 2021:
Then she needs to get the basics right or she’s leaving herself open to people ridiculing her knowledge. If she’s serious about this being a career at any rate.
I thought she was just someone with a small following on YouTube or whatever, in which case it’s more understandable. If she’s being paid for the content as a professional by the club then she should really do better.
That’s not a gender issue, that’s a professionalism issue.
So the issue is that it’s Barton doing so to push a gender issue? Fair enough, I can’t move on social media for people also ripping the piss out of a thousand “fan pundits” and their terrible takes, but I guess it’s the people being labelled clueless rather than the fact that they’re clueless because of their gender.For sure, but I'm not sure why that's relevant here. We're talking about Joey Barton being a twat for digging that clip up to ridicule her to millions of twitter followers and try and make some point about why women shouldn't be doing a job which isn't even the job she does anyway. You can't move on the internet for men posting their clueless takes on football but he's decided to pile onto her because she happens to be woman posting a clueless take about football.
Being told the score on aggregate in a group stage game?
I agree that she should be getting the basics right if she is going to talk about the match itself; let's have it right she's working for arguably the best club in the world right now, and content is going across the world.Then she needs to get the basics right or she’s leaving herself open to people ridiculing her knowledge. If she’s serious about this being a career at any rate.
I thought she was just someone with a small following on YouTube or whatever, in which case it’s more understandable. If she’s being paid for the content as a professional by the club then she should really do better.
That’s not a gender issue, that’s a professionalism issue.
Same here, would you describe it as being 3-1 on aggregate though?I often look at head to heads in champions league. Can have an impact on final league placings.
Totally agree, I don’t think she made the faux pas because of her gender. I just assumed she was another one a thousand new fan “match day vloggers”.I agree that she should be getting the basics right if she is going to talk about the match itself; let's have it right she's working for arguably the best club in the world right now, and content is going across the world.
However, everyone makes mistakes and anyone talking live doesn't have the benefit of re-editing the clip before it goes out. Remember when Chris Kamara was literally at that Portsmouth game for Soccer Saturday, and didn't even realise someone had been sent off? Everyone just laughed, and even now, I've never seen anyone actually pull him up for lack of concentration/idiocy! At the end of the day, it's just 'Kammy'.
Back on topic though, Barton is a rat, and even more so for trying to solidify his 'point' by using a clip of a young lady who has literally no power of reply to defend herself.
The other month, everyone dug out Eni Aluko for her comments on the transfer window. She actually has power of reply through her fairly large social media following.
Probably not (who knows what sort of shit I'd come out with if I had a camera in my face) but I don't think it's a huge issue that she did.Same here, would you describe it as being 3-1 on aggregate though?
Yeah, my mum always gets a bit embarrassed about female commentators, for what it's worth. She keeps her voice down at City cos she can't bear the thought of shrilly cheering above everyone else, lol. But she's also strongly in favour of women having more of a role in men's football generally. Not in terms of having mens and womens mixed games or anything like that, just in terms of having more pundits, fans, commentators, coaches, etc.Yeah you weren’t too far off tbf and you make a good point. Better than any other I’ve seen so far pushing for female pundits.
The only caveat I’ll mention on that is that my wife can’t stand female pundits though one person’s views can’t be used as evidence if anything but I’ve never spoken to any other women (who watch football) about this subject.
Pretty obvious at this point that his views on this aren't really driven by a want for higher standards in punditry, it's just straight up misogyny. He's now essentially saying women shouldn't be in any workplace around men. And apparently when a married man has an affair with a woman, it's the woman rather than his own poor decisions that will end up costing him his marriage.
Doubly egregious of him to then try and bait female presenters into publicising his shitty podcast and accuse them of being too shy to debate him. He's thick as fuck.