John Cleese drops out of Cambridge Union talk

Sorry I've edited that in now.

The irony seems to be that based on his own explanation he thinks the impressions were comic relief in a story about poor taste. Actually his impressions were the poor taste that proved his point.

Also to be fair I think the debate is heavily stacked as 90% of people would have gone in believing there's such a thing as good taste and it would have taken a pretty spectacular argument to convince a room full of people it didn't exist.
Ta. Unintended irony from the historian. It turned out to be a spectacular argument in one way or another.
 
You can't go banning speakers because you don't like what they are saying be it sport, politics, religion, or just a ****.

Sometimes we have to hear some uncomfortable truths which knock our belief systems but we're all better for it.

The art of debate is being killed. It's a skill that should be taught in public and private schools to be able to discuss controversial issues without getting personal.
Don't people get banned from this forum?
 
don't be seen to be a white, middle-aged male whatever you do...

...you'll be cancelled!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.