John Cleese drops out of Cambridge Union talk

My summary of wokism in this context:
1. The woke are trying to change the rules of discourse, but applying their new rules to historical as well as contemporary speech.
2. Context or motivation plays no part in the criticism of speech, the mere use of "offensive" terms is a no no.
3. It is an attempt to shut down points of view with which they disagree.
4. It is dangerous.
 
At the end of the day they're comedies and not political programmes. The kind of things said in Fawlty Towers or Fools and Horses are VERY tame even by todays standards.

It's funny for example that some people are offended by these programmes but aren't offended by the horrendous language used in today's music.
Music…. Is that what it’s called
 
You can't go banning speakers because you don't like what they are saying be it sport, politics, religion, or just a ****.

Sometimes we have to hear some uncomfortable truths which knock our belief systems but we're all better for it.

The art of debate is being killed. It's a skill that should be taught in public and private schools to be able to discuss controversial issues without getting personal.

Hahahaha!!

Aaaahh, tell me about it! I see there's certain types of posters avoiding this thread, especially from the US political section...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
Well I for one am offended by the tone of your post.
You come on here saying words like antidiluvian. I don't even know what a diluvian is so how can I possibly be against it.
You flood the board with big words without a care for us plebs.
The irony is that 'antidiluvian' is an incorrect spelling. Should be 'antediluvian' but spellcheck changed it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.