Salar said:
Dax777 said:
No he would not be the new Zlatan. He has been productive, but his style is more Dzeko than Zlatan. He feeds off supply not creativity.
That said, I don't know why we need a 4th striker. When we already have 3 and a bunch of attacking players behind them. SIlva Nasri Yaya AJ. We are good with 3. If Dzeko leaves he can become #3. Out fourth striker should be an old head who gets games every once in a bluemoon. :P
i thought these past few games were a clear indication that we needed a 4th striker
Not really. It was a clear indication we needed to create better scoring chances. Lest we forget. No team has 3 strikers, that have scored as many goals as Aguero, Dzeko, and Balotelli.
Aguero,Balo, Dzeko: 35 goals
Rooney,Berba, Chica, Welbeck: 33
Ade, Defoe, Pav, VDV: 25
Drogba, Torres, Stur, Anelk, Kalou: 16
VP, Cham, Gerv, Walcot, Arsh, Henry: 28
Suare, Kyt, car, Bel, Rodri, 17
In none of these situations (except for Yewnited) does the 4th striker have more than 1 goal. That right there is the problem. You simply don't get enought time as a 4th striker to add much value to the squad. Strikers need playing time. Continous playing time. Most 4th strikers will get little to none in the league and Champs league. Then they will lose timing, and there ability to score consistently.
We do NOT need a 4th striker.
We may need better play from those already getting time on the field
We may need better chance creation for those strikers we already have
We may need better crossers, wingers, defenders with better ball skills, better decision making midfielders or even better strikers to replace those who are poor. But an actual 4th striker is a waste of resources.
We are better off spending on attacking mids who can create more for those we already have, with their speed, vision, trickery passing and crossing.