You're right, the stats don't lie:-
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/romelu-lukaku/leistungsdaten/spieler/96341
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/wilfried-bony/leistungsdaten/spieler/81808
They also don't support your assertions.
They show goals and assists plus games played and were answer to someone else who claims that their stats showed Lukaku being much better. I dare say you can put other stats that show it one way or the other.They are awful stats that show next to no necessary detail to compare the players for a start, also Bony came into the league at 24 years old, an age Lukaku hasn't even reached yet. The two are not comparable Lukaku is better than Bony. Have we been watching the same two players? The only aspects they are similar in is power and stature.
£25m + £5m bonuses + Bony would be fair in today's market
May be fair but it isn't realistic. 35 and Bony and we would be lucky.
You are having a laugh, hat put Bony at 15 mill, he is 26/27 at his peak and has a great goal scoring record. Even for City his record isn't bad for the starts he had and in and out of the team. You are basically labelling him half as good as troy deaney. He didn't have the greatest season but he doesn't really suit the way we play. He was always a big threat against us and we should be looking for 30 mill minimum
Yeah good luck getting £30 million for a player clubs know we are desperate to get rid of. If we get £20 million for Bony we will be lucky.
He also has a very good goal scoring rate in the premier league and is still young. Watford, fair play to them have turned down 30 million for Troy Deeney. With the windfall of cash premier league clubs are awash with now with the new TV deal Manchester City will not under value this player, I reckon.2 sides to every coin. To our fans we may seem desperate to get rid of Bony, but there are other teams which probably think he just couldn't get any playing time ahead of Aguero.