Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
If Stones does indeed have a dick the size of a horse, does that mean that karen7 and others will want photographic proof instead of an autograph ?
Judgng by previous, I'd say yes.
If Stones does indeed have a dick the size of a horse, does that mean that karen7 and others will want photographic proof instead of an autograph ?
At this moment in time we've not even put a bid in. Stop being a fucking happy clapper and realise that this deal isn't "imminent"
At this moment in time we've not even put a bid in. Stop being a fucking happy clapper and realise that this deal isn't "imminent"
Two or three pages ago you admitted you had no idea what is going on (which is fair dos, your stating an obvious opinion). Wind forward a couple of pages and you seem have to have forgotten that angle and now claim poor showing by City. To make such an observation, you must surely have some knowledge as to why City are at fault.
I'm not looking for any arguments, but you sure change tunes as often as the weather
No, you form your opinion on how you interpret what is actually happening. If we sign Stones & you say 'it's too much' or 'I think he'll be fantastic'. That's an opinion.
If we sign Stones & you say, 'I think he'll be shit because he has a dick the size of a horse & he's always off balance because of it' , that is guesswork, not an opinion. (Unless you have seen it).
Judgng by previous, I'd say yes.
Mate...that was a great reply! Made me laugh to much to argue about it!;) Just to clear something up, No! I havent seen it!;)
How do you know this ?
If I answered that, I would just be guessing.