John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

and city are going to let him use them as a bargaining tool........ i don't fuckin think so

Its not like that. What if we are using each other ?

If we get him great. If we dont get him it costs Chelsea a shit load of money anyway - money they then cant spend on trying to get the likes of Tevez et al.......

This has been a very clever move from City. Its nothing like the Kaka deal. For starters there is none of the hatrid and vitriol in the press much the opposite. If we dont get him there wont be the same level of backlash either.

This little stunt must have seriously pissed off the top brass at Chelsea.....
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

The only way this transfer can happen is for Terry to hand in a transfer request - and that's not going to happen so just forget it
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Marvin said:
The only way this transfer can happen is for Terry to hand in a transfer request - and that's not going to happen so just forget it


AMEN
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

1. Would GC have asked Chelsea for Terry if he thought it was a no go?

2. Would GC be doing Terry a favour in letting him use us for a better deal at Chelsea?

3. Would Barry have come if Terry was not on the "wish/confirmed list"?

4. Would our owners risk looking like kids in a sweet shop only to be told no?

5. Would you be happy with a new boss every year that has new ideas and not knowing where you stand?

6. Would you change firms for more money and a fresh start after the above?
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

TedLoonBlue said:
1. Would GC have asked Chelsea for Terry if he thought it was a no go?

2. Would GC be doing Terry a favour in letting him use us for a better deal at Chelsea?

3. Would Barry have come if Terry was not on the "wish/confirmed list"?

4. Would our owners risk looking like kids in a sweet shop only to be told no?

5. Would you be happy with a new boss every year that has new ideas and not knowing where you stand?

6. Would you change firms for more money and a fresh start after the above?

no
yes
yes
no but not up to them its up to chelsea and terry
yes if i was the reason for getting rid of at least 1 of them
no cause i be gettin an improved contact as per question 2 and 5

terry will not come end of
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

TedLoonBlue said:
1. Would GC have asked Chelsea for Terry if he thought it was a no go?

2. Would GC be doing Terry a favour in letting him use us for a better deal at Chelsea?

3. Would Barry have come if Terry was not on the "wish/confirmed list"?

4. Would our owners risk looking like kids in a sweet shop only to be told no?

5. Would you be happy with a new boss every year that has new ideas and not knowing where you stand?

6. Would you change firms for more money and a fresh start after the above?

1 - No
2 - No
3 - No
4 - No
5 - No
6 - Yes!!!!!

I think some people need to adjust to change. The facts are, Chelsea are no longer top dogs. In truth they have not been for a few years now. They no longer hold all the aces in the transfer market.

Add to that the owners apparent lack of interest and they are just no longer the attractive option they maybe once were.

We have EVERYTHING to offer players, except European football which we have in twelve short months......its on!!!!
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

When you have 850 billion to play with and try for Kaka as a statement and it falls through

you don't in your next breath try for the mother of all statements and try for the captain of England(Mr Chelsea) lightly.

Not trying to bring hopes up..... but for me it's a goer or he would be on the box as we speak


just my thoughts
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.