John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?
No, if a player is 28 or older the length of time needed is reduced to 2 years from the signing of the contract.
 
MonsallBlue said:
fulhamroad22 said:
Bazzmand Show said:
Pam said:
Just to clarify, what is this about Terry not going into training? Presumably, the media would have been hanging around since this morning hoping to catch a glimpse. Was he there or not?

Its dead quite, you wouldve thought the media wouldve been all over it like a rash if he wasnt there. You wouldve also thought that SSN wouldve been wanking off if hed rocked up ready to train with the rest of the sqaud declaring "TERRY SNUBS CITY". Interesting to say the least.

He was at Cobham today. Not sure if he trained, but he was in the training ground.

I did see footage of him training on Sky News with the new training kit on, though, so I presume he trained.


Maybe I am wrong, but didnt Chelsea have their new kit before end of last season? Maybe they had training gear too?

No the training gear is all new. We wore our new home shirt for one match (Fulham at home, I think it was)- the last home game.
 
Swan lake song is just a loop frm ssn he said this about 10am the bridge of sighs is oh so quiet. come on oh so grotty let it out your shittin it
 
southstand117 said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
PhuketBlue said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I know nothing about Eto'o. I continue to hear the problems with Tevez is to do with Kia Joorabchian's demands.

If we won't pay what Kia wants, it's hard to imagine that any other club would pay it.

I think that is part of the problem...City are the only folks in town but KJ is trying to play hardball with no real avenues open to him.
tevez must be really pissed off with him then

I don't know is the answer I think KJ is just pushing it a bit re the money coming to him. I get the impression that the current City board don't play games or role over any more.
 
feedthegoat said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?
No, if a player is 28 or older the length of time needed is reduced to 2 years from the signing of the contract.

Well that would be just awful. Fair enough selling him for a good price, but for virtually free would be potentially disastrous.
 
only1paulsimpson said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?

because he is 28 he can invoke it a year earlier
Although the wording is slightly ambiguous, it could mean 28 when he signed the contract rather than when he invokes the ruling, not sure now.
 
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
PhuketBlue said:
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:
I know nothing about Eto'o. I continue to hear the problems with Tevez is to do with Kia Joorabchian's demands.

If we won't pay what Kia wants, it's hard to imagine that any other club would pay it.

I think that is part of the problem...City are the only folks in town but KJ is trying to play hardball with no real avenues open to him.

You people are in dire need of the Tevez thread. Not that I care. Things are getting confusing no matter where we post.
But back to the Terry thing and what Swanson said about Chelski's absolute confidence that they can keep Terry. What an obvious, obvious, obvious load of shite. Terry is not saying anything. Chelski are not confirming anything. Has it ever occured to SSN that there is a reason for all this and it won't be because everyone at Chelski are "absoultely confident" that there won't be a problem. I'm not watching SSN again until they get a grip.
 
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?
No, if a player is 28 or older the length of time needed is reduced to 2 years from the signing of the contract.

Well that would be just awful. Fair enough selling him for a good price, but for virtually free would be potentially disastrous.

That can only happen if the club reject the transfer request as well, so i think if Terry has said he will use that loop hole the club would accept the request and sell
 
only1paulsimpson said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?

because he is 28 he can invoke it a year earlier
I think the date the contract is signed is what matters. Terry was under 28 when he signed it.
 
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?
No, if a player is 28 or older the length of time needed is reduced to 2 years from the signing of the contract.

Well that would be just awful. Fair enough selling him for a good price, but for virtually free would be potentially disastrous.

It makes good business sense for you guys to sell. It might sound stupid to you but it does.

He is an asset with a good current market value and that will only go down. You get good money for an obviously unhappy player.

That is if indeed he does want out.....
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://forums.cfcnet.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=40124&st=800" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://forums.cfcnet.co.uk/index.php?sh ... 124&st=800</a>

we might have an influx of wums soon !
 
ffs I'd be delighted if terry just came out and rejected us just so that we KNOW something. We've already got eto'o and tevez up in the air i can't handle another one.
 
neil jung said:
only1paulsimpson said:
fulhamroad22 said:
feedthegoat said:
Terry signed his last contract 27 July 2007 so could invoke the webster ruling from 27 July 2009.

You mean 27 July 2010?

because he is 28 he can invoke it a year earlier
I think the date the contract is signed is what matters. Terry was under 28 when he signed it.

^^^THIS^^^
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top