Joleon Lescott Post Match Interview

MCC said:
Maybe Mancini has been told to sell before he buys and the board have been looking to offload Lescott as we have Nasty and Rekik as cover. Mancini is against the idea completely and that is why he has bought JL back into the team the past couple of games to show the board that he needs JL. Either that or he wasn't impressed with Nasty at Norwich!

I think I've had too much cheese.
I don't know how people read so much into little things.

Selling Joleon would be a huge mistake. The reason we didn't finish clear at the too of the league last season was because our centre half strength in depth wasn't of a high enough standard. We addressed that in the Summer with signing Nastasić, selling Joleon would create that problem again.

I would be completely flabagasted if we sold Joleon, in fact, I'm certain we won't.
 
TCIB said:
@ This thread.

[bigimg]http://i.minus.com/iSpl2Doimwb13.gif[/bigimg]


Yep.

Some idiots about tonight.<br /><br />-- Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:10 pm --<br /><br />
Caveman said:
MCC said:
Maybe Mancini has been told to sell before he buys and the board have been looking to offload Lescott as we have Nasty and Rekik as cover. Mancini is against the idea completely and that is why he has bought JL back into the team the past couple of games to show the board that he needs JL. Either that or he wasn't impressed with Nasty at Norwich!

I think I've had too much cheese.
I don't know how people read so much into little things.

Selling Joleon would be a huge mistake. The reason we didn't finish clear at the too of the league last season was because our centre half strength in depth wasn't of a high enough standard. We addressed that in the Summer with signing Nastasić, selling Joleon would create that problem again.

I would be completely flabagasted if we sold Joleon, in fact, I'm certain we won't.


What the f**k??

We had the best defence in the league last season!
 
Caveman said:
MCC said:
Maybe Mancini has been told to sell before he buys and the board have been looking to offload Lescott as we have Nasty and Rekik as cover. Mancini is against the idea completely and that is why he has bought JL back into the team the past couple of games to show the board that he needs JL. Either that or he wasn't impressed with Nasty at Norwich!

I think I've had too much cheese.
I don't know how people read so much into little things.

Selling Joleon would be a huge mistake. The reason we didn't finish clear at the too of the league last season was because our centre half strength in depth wasn't of a high enough standard. We addressed that in the Summer with signing Nastasić, selling Joleon would create that problem again.

I would be completely flabagasted if we sold Joleon, in fact, I'm certain we won't.
Don't you'll start me off again.
 
Bilboblue said:
TCIB said:
@ This thread.

[bigimg]http://i.minus.com/iSpl2Doimwb13.gif[/bigimg]


Yep.

Some idiots about tonight.

-- Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:10 pm --

Caveman said:
MCC said:
Maybe Mancini has been told to sell before he buys and the board have been looking to offload Lescott as we have Nasty and Rekik as cover. Mancini is against the idea completely and that is why he has bought JL back into the team the past couple of games to show the board that he needs JL. Either that or he wasn't impressed with Nasty at Norwich!

I think I've had too much cheese.
I don't know how people read so much into little things.

Selling Joleon would be a huge mistake. The reason we didn't finish clear at the too of the league last season was because our centre half strength in depth wasn't of a high enough standard. We addressed that in the Summer with signing Nastasić, selling Joleon would create that problem again.

I would be completely flabagasted if we sold Joleon, in fact, I'm certain we won't.


What the f**k??

We had the best defence in the league last season!
Why '**' out letters when I know exactly what's missing?

When Kompany or Joleon were fit, there was not a better pairing in the Prem; when one of them was out the cover was of insufficient quality and mistakes were made. We shouldn't get ourselves into that position again.
 
If he was going we wouldnt have played him, it effectively removes value with him cup tied.

He may end up going but cant see it being already decided
 
johnmc said:
MCC said:
edgecroft said:
Loyalty bonus.

Maybe but can't see us doing the dirty on a good servant. The owners are honorable people and if it's in a contract it's in a contract.

How would an interview change this.

Never mentioned anything about an interview but it's obvious there have been things going on behind the scenes with JL as he has been constantly linked with other sides - Paul Lambert publicly stated that he wanted him which is a bit strange for a manger to do. No smoke without fire and all that.
 
nout wrong with him in that video. heard on the radio that his agent has released a statement saying he is staying at the club and he does not want to leave. thread closed see ya later
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.