joleon lescott

Let's now give the facts around this. One, and only one, idiot who had apparently been chased by stewards in the first half came and stood with his friends immediately behind the goal for the second half.
We had a corner in the second half and he shouted "come on scar face lets have a goal". A completely irrelevant and out of orde comment.
Lescott clearly heard it as he gave a dirty look towards the area where we were.
The unfortunate thing was the cretin who said it was hiding behind others and not in his correct seat and therefore identifying him may be difficult
Those around the guy who had balls gave him what for and I have tweeted this to Lescott on two occasions since the game.
The comments of one idiot do not condone his choice not to clap the other 7000 and could be seen as an excuse for his disappointment in his blame for fault for the goal.
Two wrongs do not make a right!!
 
SWP's back said:
Bilboblue said:
SWP's back said:
You think we were zonal marking? Hahaha fucks sake.

It was Joleons man. We haven't been zonal since Mancini left.

It was Negredo's man that scored.
After bouncing off the fucking keeper after Lescott (who is not fucking good enough) lost his man and gave him a free header 10 yards out.

So it's still Lescotts fault despite us having two other possible tries to stop the goal.

Riiiiiiiiight.

Carry on.
 
colbee59 said:
I say ban the pricks don't want these sort of fans at City. Even if he was the worst player on the pitch, which he wasn't by a long way.

He would have had to have been completely shit to beat Boyota to that title but he wasn't far behind. Nastasic must have an even worse right foot than him if Pellegrini thought playing him there was a good idea.

We desperately need a quality CB to partner VK.
 
Bilboblue said:
SWP's back said:
Bilboblue said:
It was Negredo's man that scored.
After bouncing off the fucking keeper after Lescott (who is not fucking good enough) lost his man and gave him a free header 10 yards out.

So it's still Lescotts fault despite us having two other possible tries to stop the goal.

Riiiiiiiiight.

Carry on.
Yes.

If he had done his job of marking someone, or at least trying to challenge for the ball, then the rest wouldn't have happened.

He let his man, his man nearly scored and Pants fluffed his catch.
 
Had he been a volunteer or getting his bus fare for playing I could see his point and might have some sympathy for him.

But as a guy earning more in a week than many on this forum will earn in 5 years he should be able to take it.

I'm not saying that giving one if our players some shit is the best way to get the best out of them, but when the financial rewards at the end of the week are so high then he should shut up and show the rest of the fans some respect at the end of the game.

Sorry Joleon but carry on like this and you'll lose the respect of the people that have backed you through thick and thin.
 
forevermancity said:
some absolute twats sat near me giving him dogs

strangely enough, didn't see them going to games pre takeover

What was said to Lescott was completely wrong and he's right to moan about it, but WTF kind of a post is this?
 
SWP's back said:
Bilboblue said:
SWP's back said:
After bouncing off the fucking keeper after Lescott (who is not fucking good enough) lost his man and gave him a free header 10 yards out.

So it's still Lescotts fault despite us having two other possible tries to stop the goal.

Riiiiiiiiight.

Carry on.
Yes.

If he had done his job of marking someone, or at least trying to challenge for the ball, then the rest wouldn't have happened.

He let his man, his man nearly scored and Pants fluffed his catch.

If Pantilimon hadn't spilt a relatively simple catch, or if Negredo had followed his man.....

But of course it's Lescotts fault.

As I said, carry on.
 
SWP's back said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
forevermancity said:
some absolute twats sat near me giving him dogs

strangely enough, didn't see them going to games pre takeover
Fuck! I forgot to sign your register before leaving the ground.
No fans ever gave abuse to City players pre-takeover. Ask Egdhill.


All this pre takeover shit, the abuse of some players "pre takeover" was amazing. Poor Lescott would not have lasted 2 minutes!!!
 
Bilboblue said:
SWP's back said:
Bilboblue said:
So it's still Lescotts fault despite us having two other possible tries to stop the goal.

Riiiiiiiiight.

Carry on.
Yes.

If he had done his job of marking someone, or at least trying to challenge for the ball, then the rest wouldn't have happened.

He let his man, his man nearly scored and Pants fluffed his catch.

If Pantilimon hadn't spilt a relatively simple catch, or if Negredo had followed his man.....

But of course it's Lescotts fault.

As I said, carry on.
Whose fault was it that there was a fucking glorious chance for a header in our box?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.