I could be wrong but I think it's only SundayStill Tuesday?
I could be wrong but I think it's only SundayStill Tuesday?
Let's ask @Bill WalkerI could be wrong but I think it's only Sunday
Is that like a sparkling Tuesday but not Carbonated ?Still Tuesday?
I know we won everything and the squad is fantastic so I have no complaints. An extra creative outlet would be great is all I am saying. On the second point you could be right. One in one out is not a bad policy anyway.Just think what we could have won last season if only we'd had another creative player ;)
What makes you think we can only negotiate with one player at a time? None of us have a clue how busy they are behind closed doors.
The Tarquins?I hate it when people say “The Arsenal” it’s fecking Arsenal there is no “The” before it!
I'm going for a day ending in Y, in a month with 28 days in itSo it appears the new thing is to guess which day it will be completed on but say it with a little bit of authority so that if by chance it happens on that day, you can claim a little bit of Internet clout as an ITK.
I'll go for Thursday. Just a random guess so if by chance it does happen on Thursday, I'm not ITK (although I did call trafford to Burnley before anyone else on his thread in the academy page :))
Who would walk straight into our starting 11 at right wing (replacing Mahrez) ???, who isThe player we target is normally high value. Look at gvardiol. The one in one out policy is another indication. The whole no value in the market is a ruse. Plenty of players we could be targeting. Mahrez is certainly replaceable. Gundo probably not.
Someone said it earlier, we have plenty of good players but not enough match winners. They cost a lot of money unfortunately.
The financial microscope is on us like a rash.
The squad is fantastic but we lack a creative player. Games would be won so much easier. Haaland’s ability’s are wasted in some games.
Pep said we waiting on a few to leave would also suggest financial restraint.
You should know by nowHow can the financial microscope be on us when we're posting profits of more than half a billion quid?
The microscope should be on the red mardarses and Chelsea after them getting done for FFP but look at them spunking money, especially the rags. Those fines have done absolutely nothing to stifle their spending so why should we be under scrutiny?
We aren’t posting profits of half a billion. Last was £47 miil profit on £600 mill revenue.How can the financial microscope be on us when we're posting profits of more than half a billion quid?
The microscope should be on the red mardarses and Chelsea after them getting done for FFP but look at them spunking money, especially the rags. Those fines have done absolutely nothing to stifle their spending so why should we be under scrutiny?