Jude Bellingham

[Kippax Street 1880]

Why has he avoided a ban yet the Turkish defender has been suspended?

 

[mattcity5]

Why has he avoided a ban yet the Turkish defender has been suspended?

Because they did different things.

 

[Kippax Street 1880]

Because they did different things.

True, one was a 'political gesture' no idea what but all the Turks in the comments seem apocalyptic with rage it's been classed as offensive. One grabbed his cock and thrusted it towards the opposition bench.

 

[mattcity5]

True, one was a 'political gesture' no idea what but all the Turks in the comments seem apocalyptic with rage it's been classed as offensive. One grabbed his cock and thrusted it towards the opposition bench.

Agree it is a bit weird.

Maybe Demirel should have just claimed it was an 'inside joke' like Bellingham did.

 

[ancoats]

Because they did different things.

Wrong..

Because he's playing for England and Real Madrid,

 

[ted the grass]

True, one was a 'political gesture' no idea what but all the Turks in the comments seem apocalyptic with rage it's been classed as offensive. One grabbed his cock and thrusted it towards the opposition bench.

 

[mattcity5]

Wrong..

Because he's playing for England and Real Madrid,

Fair point. They also did different things.

Think you've got the main reason spot on though.

 

[ancoats]

True, one was a 'political gesture' no idea what but all the Turks in the comments seem apocalyptic with rage it's been classed as offensive. One grabbed his cock and thrusted it towards the opposition bench.

But the rule comes under both gestures. offensive or political and should have the same punishment

 

[kerem gokmen]

True, one was a 'political gesture' no idea what but all the Turks in the comments seem apocalyptic with rage it's been classed as offensive. One grabbed his cock and thrusted it towards the opposition bench.

turkey's defence is : ''wolf is a symbol of turks.. it is not political'' which is right. it is a symbol for thousands of years... no political background. you can consider it as ''three lions'', or german eagle etc.

the other side is stating that, including many turks:
''yes, wolf is not politcal, but this wolf gesture with hand dates back only to 1990s, which has a political background''
they are also right.
uefa is standing on that side. and taking this gesture as political.
i am not making any comments here as a turk.

but the argument is just about that.

 

[Kippax Street 1880]

turkey's defence is : ''wolf is a symbol of turks.. it is not political'' which is right. it is a symbol for thousands of years... no political background. you can consider it as ''three lions'', or german eagle etc.

the other side is stating that, including many turks:
''yes, wolf is not politcal, but this wolf gesture with hand dates back only to 1990s, which has a political background''
they are also right.
uefa is standing on that side. and taking this gesture as political.
i am not making any comments here as a turk.

but the argument is just about that.

Seems harsh, I'm not massively clued up on Turkish politics myself but I got the impression it was sort of a 'national gesture' rather than something with massively negative connotations like a Nazi Salute (bad analogy I know but I can't think of another politically charged hand gesture).