just back, and believe we have appointed a clown

[CheethamHillBlue]

He made what I and others (some of who were actually at the game) thought was a very valid point. Do you think we're playing well at the moment? We're too narrow, muddled tactics and players out of position. That's a fact pal.

You can say that about most of the teams in the Premiership. For most of this season including when Hughes was in charge. That was the reason we drew all our matches for about 2 months. The point about the OP was his use of -
"tactically inept doesnt even come close, i cannot even be arsed to list the many tactical failings, just to say today was woeful, the brand of football unwatchable and a complete failure taking into account the players at his disposal.

if this is the level and the style of football, please go now, its turgid narrow shite".

After half a dozen matches in charge, that's an over reaction in my book. Especially considering 4 of those matches have been won.
But if you think that's a valid point too

 

[fathellensbellend]

Funny old thing, but there is one BIG comparison between Mancini and Hughes.

Its quite a simple one.

The away form.

Shite under both.

i would agree with that, it cost hughes big time.

what i want is the manchester city that looked chelsea in the eye, and said come on, we will give you a game.

if we didnt have it, i could live with it, but we have some talent in our squad, lets get the most out of it.

 

[Freestyler]

shock horror, but fuck it i'm gonna post it

I can confirm mancini only signed a 6 month deal, and that only, he will then sign the other 3 years in the summer if we decide to keep him on at city.

The lost in translation shit was bollocks in that press conference, the way Mancini said it was correct, cook just tried to cover it.

 

[The Fixer]

Funny old thing, but there is one BIG comparison between Mancini and Hughes.

Its quite a simple one.

The away form.

Shite under both.

Spot on pal, is it the players? when you look at it we all keep saying the gaffer has 200 mill of talent at his disposal but in reality he hasn't we just way over spent on talent worth perhaps 100 mill imo.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

He made what I and others (some of who were actually at the game) thought was a very valid point. Do you think we're playing well at the moment? We're too narrow, muddled tactics and players out of position. That's a fact pal.

You can say that about most of the teams in the Premiership. For most of this season including when Hughes was in charge. That was the reason we drew all our matches for about 2 months. The point about the OP was his use of -
"tactically inept doesnt even come close, i cannot even be arsed to list the many tactical failings, just to say today was woeful, the brand of football unwatchable and a complete failure taking into account the players at his disposal.

if this is the level and the style of football, please go now, its turgid narrow shite".

After half a dozen matches in charge, that's an over reaction in my book. Especially considering 4 of those matches have been won.
But if you think that's a valid point too

That's the OP's opinion (and mine). We're entitled to it. If you want to point out why we're wrong, with well-thought out arguments then please do so.

But you waffled and waffled and haven't answered my question. Do you think we are playing well at the moment? Yes or No.

 

[Damocles]

shock horror, but fuck it i'm gonna post it

I can confirm mancini only signed a 6 month deal, and that only, he will then sign the other 3 years in the summer if we decide to keep him on at city.

The lost in translation shit was bollocks in that press conference, the way Mancini said it was correct, cook just tried to cover it.

Shock horro, but fuck it I'm going to post it.

Every person at the club, everybody associated with Mancini, everybody who talks to the players, everybody who talks to the media say it's for 3 and a half years.

 

[CheethamHillBlue]

The original poster used the words 'please go now.' His opinion though if you agree that's up to you. Regardless of how well we are playing (i'm sure you yearn for the heady days of a 3-3 draw with Burnley) i wouldn't suggest the manager goes after 6 games.
Only a clown would imo

 

[Freestyler]

shock horror, but fuck it i'm gonna post it

I can confirm mancini only signed a 6 month deal, and that only, he will then sign the other 3 years in the summer if we decide to keep him on at city.

The lost in translation shit was bollocks in that press conference, the way Mancini said it was correct, cook just tried to cover it.

Shock horro, but fuck it I'm going to post it.

Every person at the club, everybody associated with Mancini, everybody who talks to the players, everybody who talks to the media say it's for 3 and a half years.

It's 6 months mate, seriously.

 

[The Fixer]

shock horror, but fuck it i'm gonna post it

I can confirm mancini only signed a 6 month deal, and that only, he will then sign the other 3 years in the summer if we decide to keep him on at city.

The lost in translation shit was bollocks in that press conference, the way Mancini said it was correct, cook just tried to cover it.

Shock horro, but fuck it I'm going to post it.

Every person at the club, everybody associated with Mancini, everybody who talks to the players, everybody who talks to the media say it's for 3 and a half years.

We're doomed, president let the nukes go :)

 

[Joycee Banercheck]

*awaits weekly/daily "Mancini out threads" and references to Italian sheep shagging*