Kinkybyname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 2,991
- Team supported
- Manchester City
wrong website
Just Stop Oil protests
- Thread starter mosssideblue
- Start date
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Anyone not glueing themselves to the M60 or Deansgate.
hilts
Well-Known Member
Really? Haha okay:-)
L
L
lazerblue
Guest
Johnny Mars Bar
Well-Known Member
Funny how this lot have gone quiet now they've got Palestine to protest about.
Almost as if these rent-a-mob muppets just like to moan about anything that's the flavour of the week.
Almost as if these rent-a-mob muppets just like to moan about anything that's the flavour of the week.
You don't think people have the right to protest? Remind me how you're left of centre again?
Johnny Mars Bar
Well-Known Member
Please point out where I said that.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
two points of interest here - the "bad at basic politics" number 10 shitshow don't seem to quite understand that this also reveals that they are off loading responsibility for Policing protests because they don't have the man power to it.
Secondly - how does a motorist prove that they were in the queue - that there was no alternate route they could take? That a certain group were the ones behind assembling the blockage? If several groups assemble is it Just Stop Oil or is it the one's who assembled there from the Rainforest Alliance?
How do you quantify your loss? Its just an announcement for announcements sake again - file it under "never gonna happen"
uk.news.yahoo.com
Secondly - how does a motorist prove that they were in the queue - that there was no alternate route they could take? That a certain group were the ones behind assembling the blockage? If several groups assemble is it Just Stop Oil or is it the one's who assembled there from the Rainforest Alliance?
How do you quantify your loss? Its just an announcement for announcements sake again - file it under "never gonna happen"
Activists who block roads could be forced to pay compensation, report suggests
The proposal is expected to be contained in a report by Lord Walney, the Government’s independent adviser on political violence and disruption.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 16,848
two points of interest here - the "bad at basic politics" number 10 shitshow don't seem to quite understand that this also reveals that they are off loading responsibility for Policing protests because they don't have the man power to it.
Secondly - how does a motorist prove that they were in the queue - that there was no alternate route they could take? That a certain group were the ones behind assembling the blockage? If several groups assemble is it Just Stop Oil or is it the one's who assembled there from the Rainforest Alliance?
How do you quantify your loss? Its just an announcement for announcements sake again - file it under "never gonna happen"
Activists who block roads could be forced to pay compensation, report suggests
The proposal is expected to be contained in a report by Lord Walney, the Government’s independent adviser on political violence and disruption.
Correct. They would have a difficulty proving causation, particularly in a busy urban area with multiple factors that could cause congestion and multiple alternatives to driving.
In the tort of negligence you can't claim for pure economic loss, which is what some of the spurious cases of lossed of money might amount to.
It's not a new threat, just an old one repackaged, previously protests have been told they have to pay for public liability insurance or cost of policy.
Worth highlighting that Lord Walney is better known as John Woodcock. The disgraced former labour MP now employed as a Tory attack dog.
Amazed he also didn’t to manage to claim you was a right wing Nazi sympathiser, although you can hazard a guess he was thinking it lol