There's some interesting points there.
The women's game is fighting for equality and all that comes with it, but are they making it harder for themselves by not wanting any different equipment (pitch/goals/balls) that could make it seem they have it easy?
I don't think there's any practicality in suggesting a smaller pitch, or smaller goals, due to the amount of matches that take place on what were previously men's pitches. Actually, with how the men's game has changed since the rules were created, I don't think that women should have a smaller pitch/goals anyway, just that the men's pitches should be larger. Obviously due to stadiums etc that can't happen though anyway.
But they could use a slightly different ball. Many tennis tournaments see women use a different ball. In athletics, the shot/discus/javelin are all lighter. If women used a slightly small ball, possibly slightly lighter too, would we end up getting a better spectacle because of it?
Tbh I dont think it's necessary, and this is where my viewpoint differs to yours. If City women are on one channel I'd rather watch them than just about any match that doesn't involve City men. City women v Everton women or Palace v Wolves? Not even a doubt. I'd rather watch Chelsea v Arsenal women than that match too.