feelymcfeel
Well-Known Member
Yes, for your clarity, if someone says a sponsor who wants to be invovled in sponsoring the womens team should earmark a specific amount of their money that goes to the womens team it means exactly what it says. It's not a trick.
That's fine and makes sense. Say that then, instead of throwing around spurious figures that at even a cursory glance would be obviously unworkable.
You never did clarify whether she stated the quoted figures or the quote was wrong - I didn't watch MNF and there isn't a video attached to the tweet, just the quote. Again, if the quote is incorrect or the context drastically changes the meaning I retract what I said.
The questions I asked were clearly hyperbolic but in an event with externally defined amounts, as in 'you will give 50% to each of' and not 'I have decided I will give 50% to each of' seemingly ridiculous situations will need to be discussed.
To be clear: 'I will give MCFC £x of which, y% will be for the women's team' absolutely makes sense. For a third party to define what those proportions should be (which is how I interpreted Carney's comments) does not.
My comments haven't been intended as an attack on women's football, merely to note that defining absolute figures for sponsorship amounts as seems to have happened last night in my opinion cannot and will not work.
Last edited: