west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 33,900
He'd do better standing in London.If Neville was the Labour candidate for the Mayor of Manchester would you refuse to vote for him?
He'd do better standing in London.If Neville was the Labour candidate for the Mayor of Manchester would you refuse to vote for him?
Great... another f*cking Champagne Socialist.https://www.theguardian.com/politic...joins-labour-and-considers-move-into-politics
Gary Neville joins Labour and considers move into politics
Some have speculated he may run to succeed Andy Burnham as mayor of Greater Manchester
“I want to support Labour. I do believe that we need a progressive Labour party but one that not just looks after the left side … it has to come towards the centre.”
![]()
Better dead than red eh? Make your f**king mind up ratboy!
Starmer will love him, he doesn't have a f**king clue what progressive means.
Interesting.Yes.
Don’t think he’s a socialist and doesn’t come across as the champagne type , it is possible to be a Labour supporter and successful.Great... another f*cking Champagne Socialist.
Interesting.
Would you vote for any other labour candidate?
To some of us football is more important than politics and he’s a red ****Nevilles views are fine. Don't be so immature. Ooooohhh he played for our rivals. Jesus wept.
I just see him as a ****.To some of us football is more important than politics and he’s a red ****
Big chance to eviscerate the fucker tomorrow at PMQ's - probably best to cry off with a broken nail and let Angie drive the wooden stake right through the fat shapeshifting vampire's heart
Starmer will give Boris another hiding. Like he does every time.
The problem is it's not like cross-exanination in court. You can't just take up one statement (lie) and say "that's not true, is it?" then follow up line by line (lie by lie) because you only get six questions. It's why Johnson never answered the 6th question, just repeated the usual slogans.Hopefully he is preparing like a barrister tonight getting questions for which the stock answers just don't apply. He doesn't have to make him look like a fool Johnson has that covered himself
For me, he always does well at PMQs but he seemed to step it up today, laughing at Johnson whilst even getting in some Labour policies moving forward.Starmer cracked a few funnies that hit the target. Liked his "Apology must have been written by a Lawyer" line.
If he shows that humourous side the voters he's after might warm to him more.
Sadly the people he wants their votes from will see the skewed news headlines of a defiant prime minister who's removed plan B COVID restrictions to improve the economy etc...For me, he always does well at PMQs but he seemed to step it up today, laughing at Johnson whilst even getting in some Labour policies moving forward.
really don't think he lands the blows he should. Angela Raynor has been much better in her brief stand in appearances. Trouble is that Starmer does not come across with any passion or socialist princpls.For me, he always does well at PMQs but he seemed to step it up today, laughing at Johnson whilst even getting in some Labour policies moving forward.
And that’s why the opposition had to keep the focus elsewhere. The PM cannot have a bad week every week and will always find a way to put the positive stuff across.Sadly the people he wants their votes from will see the skewed news headlines of a defiant prime minister who's removed plan B COVID restrictions to improve the economy etc...
Probably right and it’s good to see the two of them coming from different angles to smash the points home.really don't think he lands the blows he should. Angela Raynor has been much better in her brief stand in appearances. Trouble is that Starmer does not come across with any passion or socialist princpls.