Keir Starmer

[Churchlawtonblue]

Keir Starmer needs replacing with Mick Lynch. It's that simple.

 

[mat]

Keir Starmer needs replacing with Mick Lynch. It's that simple.

Knowing Mick he'd refuse it.

 

[Vic]

One could very well argue Jeremy Hunt is Starmer-like; without character, not very engaging, but more accessible than Johnson.

In fact, probably less wishy washy than Starmer, but within the same framework of what he'd look like as a leader, he would stop Starmer being PM. And if he's what a centre politician looks like, then there's a few that's around.

And what party is Hunt in again...?

Daft.

I don't think Jeremy Hunt was named by his parents after a Labour Party leader.

Hunt: "... he tried his hand at a number of different entrepreneurial business ventures, with three failed start-ups including an attempt to export marmalade to Japan"

Starmer: "He served as a legal officer for the campaign group Liberty until 1990. He was a member of Doughty Street Chambers from 1990 onwards, primarily working on human rights issues."

 

[Bigga]

Daft.

I don't think Jeremy Hunt was named by his parents after a Labour Party leader.

Hunt: "... he tried his hand at a number of different entrepreneurial business ventures, with three failed start-ups including an attempt to export marmalade to Japan"

Starmer: "He served as a legal officer for the campaign group Liberty until 1990. He was a member of Doughty Street Chambers from 1990 onwards, primarily working on human rights issues."

What kind of argument is that??

"Daft"?

Johnson being PM after his disastrous career destroys your whole argument.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

What kind of argument is that??

"Daft"?

Johnson being PM after his disastrous career destroys your whole argument.

Quick question, simple answer, do you think Johnson’s government has moved as far right as Trump’s?

 

[Bigga]

Quick question, simple answer, do you think Johnson’s government has moved as far right as Trump’s?

I think the man is bereft of ideas and scrabbling at anything.

He'll lurch left and he'll lurch right, depending on what the country's mood is.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

I think the man is bereft of ideas and scrabbling at anything.

He'll lurch left and he'll lurch right, depending on what the country's mood is.

That does me. Cheers, bud.

 

[Vic]

What kind of argument is that??

"Daft"?

Johnson being PM after his disastrous career destroys your whole argument.

I'm lost. My argument is that your attempt to equate Hunt and Starmer is ridiculous.

 

[Bigga]

I'm lost. My argument is that your attempt to equate Hunt and Starmer is ridiculous.

No, my point was current Labour and Con politics arent' that far apart and if the Tories got rid of Johnson for a Johnson-lite (see Starmer or Hunt), Starmer would be fucked.

I said there are many politicians that are Starmer-like [in presentation].

He's nothing special or standout. He's just on the opposition.

 

[Vic]

No, my point was current Labour and Con politics arent' that far apart and if the Tories got rid of Johnson for a Johnson-lite (see Starmer or Hunt), Starmer would be fucked.

I said there are many politicians that are Starmer-like [in presentation].

He's nothing special or standout. He's just on the opposition.

Labour isn't legislating to break the law, or to suppress protest, suppress voting, traffic asylum seekers, piss off our biggest export market, appease the DUP, stop employers settling strikes, etc etc

Please don't bring this "they're all the same" nonsense from the US thread to this thread.

I'll put up with Starmer's wishy-washy (but electable) socialism to get rid of the not so wishy-washy fascists.