This feels like an argument Labour had over 100 years ago - arguing about whether the political party should be directly supporting unions and workers, or whether it needs to have some distance if it's going to be in a position to help create a society that is fairer for all workers.Confirmed he doesn't give a fuck about supporting workers.
I don't know if I should walk away or stay inside banging my head against a brick wall.
I thought the latter had been the consensus for just about every Labour leader since.
Sam Tarry or Keir Starmer standing on a picket line will do f-all right now, except make them feel better. It allows the Tories to frame the dispute as "politics", and makes it easier for them to justify not getting involved. It makes it less likely that the dispute would be settled. It also makes the Labour party look less like a government in waiting - particularly if they're arguing, as both Labour and the unions are, that the current govt are ultimately the ones preventing a settlement.
Unions and the party should, where possible, be working together to achieve common aims, but they should both know that there are advantages in taking different paths, even if the ultimate direction is similar. It's surely the whole point of why the party was created in the first place.