Keir Starmer

2? I think only 1 actual investigation where they reviewed footage shot threw a window and concluded he hadn’t breached lockdown rules. This was before it was uncovered that Angela Rayner had also been there - although not sure what difference that makes. The police have so far declined to reopen as they say they don’t prosecute retrospectively but that’s not the same as an investigation. Whether Starmer has done wrong or not he has exposed the problem with gutter politics - if you want to play in the gutter you better make sure your shit doesn’t smell.

Give it up, you don't need to go down this road to prove your loyalty to the party.

In other news Frank Dobson has resigned his position for corpsing when it was revealed Starmer had a curry.
 
Give it up, you don't need to go down this road to prove your loyalty to the party.

In other news Frank Dobson has resigned his position for corpsing when it was revealed Starmer had a curry.

If you’re referring to me I’m merely seeking to correct (or be corrected) on the fact there weren’t 2 investigations. Or is there a some new rule that we can’t question if something is actually correct or not?
 
If you’re referring to me I’m merely seeking to correct (or be corrected) on the fact there weren’t 2 investigations. Or is there a some new rule that we can’t question if something is actually correct or not?

The two situations aren't comparable. It's just a waste of energy to even pretend they are.
 
facing a binary choice you can vote/back Starmer or align yourself with what you witnessed on GMB this morning and many many other times - if Johnson is yer man and you are happy that he can't and won't do anything to help pensioners who have had to take a bus all day to keep warm and claim - falsely - that he enabled them to do that then you have to ask yourself what sort of human being are you?
 
facing a binary choice you can vote/back Starmer or align yourself with what you witnessed on GMB this morning and many many other times - if Johnson is yer man and you are happy that he can't and won't do anything to help pensioners who have had to take a bus all day to keep warm and claim - falsely - that he enabled them to do that then you have to ask yourself what sort of human being are you?
I'd ask what motivates a person to fire off a rant like that barely 2 minutes after reading my response to someone else without quoting me?

For the record my Labour MP has a rock solid majority so I'm enabling fuck all.... but I did notice the secondary requirement to 'back' him. Not sure where you are going here.

Surely you are not suggesting that anyone that is critical of the opposition is somehow responsible for the plight of vulnerable pensioners?
 
facing a binary choice you can vote/back Starmer or align yourself with what you witnessed on GMB this morning and many many other times - if Johnson is yer man and you are happy that he can't and won't do anything to help pensioners who have had to take a bus all day to keep warm and claim - falsely - that he enabled them to do that then you have to ask yourself what sort of human being are you?
They could sit in Wetherspoons and drink bottomless coffee all day.
 
99% of period dramas are shite.

That percentage might decrease as I age, but for now, pretty much all are shite.

It’s not so much the period drama it is just the vacuous toffs in general.

Made in Chelsea and anything involving the arseholes that make up the cast has the same response.

Thick people with very little to say for themselves but who have been "educated" enough and taught to speak a certain way that they can get away with it.
 
It’s not so much the period drama it is just the vacuous toffs in general.

Made in Chelsea and anything involving the arseholes that make up the cast has the same response.

Thick people with very little to say for themselves but who have been "educated" enough and taught to speak a certain way that they can get away with it.
I’d be happy to agree that 100% of vacuous toff programs are shite.

99% of period dramas I’ll stand by though.
 
I'd ask what motivates a person to fire off a rant like that barely 2 minutes after reading my response to someone else without quoting me?

For the record my Labour MP has a rock solid majority so I'm enabling fuck all.... but I did notice the secondary requirement to 'back' him. Not sure where you are going here.

Surely you are not suggesting that anyone that is critical of the opposition is somehow responsible for the plight of vulnerable pensioners?

I'd ask whats eating your conscience? I was just putting out there what my view is in terms of the two major party leaders - you can criticize the the content but why have a pop at me?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top