Keir Starmer

They didn't. Nothing in the remaining video is inconsistent or differs in context. At best he chose to be ambiguous.

He didn't address the siege and water point directly. He deliberately did that.
Look at the gmb link on the other page , they clipped him before he could say within international law

leaving you to it
 
Not sure why you have to be on the left to know it's wrong to be ambiguous on starving kids or treat a hardworking young mum like dirt when she's been campaigning in the consistency for 6 years.

I guess you don't have to be left wing just not as nasty as some of the posters on here, I mean who really tries to take the piss out of a group who are uncomfortable with starving kids.
 
Not sure why you have to be on the left to know it's wrong to be ambiguous on starving kids or treat a hardworking young mum like dirt when she's been campaigning in the consistency for 6 years.
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?
 
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?

Educate yourself.
 
It’s called politics. Wasn’t necessarily pointing to what you mention, more the Momentum few who have gone ballistic at the thought of any of the left being ousted.

Am I remembering right that Corbyn and Abbott did the same by ousting the right of the party?
no one was ousted, people who couldn't act like adults and show support for the broard church the party was flounced and left, but you won't be able to name any deselected or kicked out I bet.

Mandelsons lot and the progress think tank never could share a table with people maybe a little bit a socialist, where as socialist actively supported the party through kinnock, smith, blair even though they were not of the same idiologies, Starmer though is different, he has no unity or sense of loyalty to the many factions and beliefs Labour has held for a 100 years, if he thought you were not of use he would stab
you in the back
 
no one was ousted, people who couldn't act like adults and show support for the broard church the party was flounced and left, but you won't be able to name any deselected or kicked out I bet.

Mandelsons lot and the progress think tank never could share a table with people maybe a little bit a socialist, where as socialist actively supported the party through kinnock, smith, blair even though they were not of the same idiologies, Starmer though is different, he has no unity or sense of loyalty to the many factions and beliefs Labour has held for a 100 years, if he thought you were not of use he would stab
you in the back
Like a dictator?
 
Proportion of Britons who believe X has had a...

Keir Starmer

Good week: 45%
Bad week: 20%

Rishi Sunak

Good week: 20%
Bad week: 55%

via @OpiniumResearch

I saw that - if it’s from the latest Opinium poll out tonight that’s incredible considering the Abbott stuff.

Though I saw a post saying it’s from last week?
 
I saw that - if it’s from the latest Opinium poll out tonight that’s incredible considering the Abbott stuff.

Though I saw a post saying it’s from last week?

Looks like it is. Just checked the data tables from last week's opinium, and the figures match.

Surprised. It was reposted by Ben Walker from Britain Elects in response to an article about the last week of campaigning, and the guy from Opinium who was teasing tonight's poll, retweeted it. I knew they were big teases, but really :)
 
Caught a bit of him on Sky yesterday morning when he was asked about Abbott and his about turn etc etc. That’s when he lost my vote.

His response: I answered that yesterday. Well if you did why don’t you repeat the answer for those who didn’t see it? Twice he was asked, twice the same. Can’t be trusted to be straight on something so benign as Dianne Abbott for FFS. The bloke is a snivelling little **** who is full of shit - he’s hard to listen to at the best of times but when he tries to peddle an alternative reality like Trump is famed for he can fuck right off and when he gets there he can fuck off some more - I can’t and won’t vote for this poor man’s Trump.

Lib Dem’s most likely getting my vote (when I see where they are on defence).
 
Caught a bit of him on Sky yesterday morning when he was asked about Abbott and his about turn etc etc. That’s when he lost my vote.

His response: I answered that yesterday. Well if you did why don’t you repeat the answer for those who didn’t see it? Twice he was asked, twice the same. Can’t be trusted to be straight on something so benign as Dianne Abbott for FFS. The bloke is a snivelling little **** who is full of shit - he’s hard to listen to at the best of times but when he tries to peddle an alternative reality like Trump is famed for he can fuck right off and when he gets there he can fuck off some more - I can’t and won’t vote for this poor man’s Trump.

Lib Dem’s most likely getting my vote (when I see where they are on defence).
Nobody but the journos were interested in the abbott stuff, they pushed it for a week whilst we have real life problems to be dealing with . You were never going to vote labour tbf but if you are basing your flouncing away from him based on this one non issue then just as well
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top