Kia in talk's with AC. (merged)

[tommyhair]

pissed off if he goes on a loan. Don't let them take the piss, sell him, get rid

 

[LoveCity]

Surely we wait for alternate offers? Even Corinthians might do better than £19m if their interest is still genuine.

 

[phil31]

Has the donut returned from Argentina yet?

 

[LoveCity]

Be funny if on the same day we sell him, we publicly announced legal action against him. That'd piss on his parade quickly.

 

[Blue Haze]

Tevez taking a pay cut down to under 100k per week. What a fucking tool.

Good job, Kia, you just more than halved the wages of the man you're supposed to financially represent.

Between Hughes and Tevez he has ruined both their careers and finances with shit advice. How can anyone want to be represented by such a bozo?

 

[buckshot]

what would we get out of fucking Kia by turning it down, aside from continuing to pay Tevez' full wages whilst he sits in Argentina?

schadenfreude

Tevez is effectively on strike so is getting no wages from MCFC.
Kia Joc is trying to bounce us into a deal. City will stand firm.

We are still paying his wages

City are still paying his wages even though he's AWOL? This can't be right.

 

[super_city_si]

schadenfreude

Tevez is effectively on strike so is getting no wages from MCFC.
Kia Joc is trying to bounce us into a deal. City will stand firm.

We are still paying his wages

City are still paying his wages even though he's AWOL? This can't be right.

I dont get this? Why is he being paid if he refuses to return?

 

[TCIB]

Hold fast chaps, Tolmie has hinted things will get juicy, but in our favour.

 

[sbm]

We are still paying his wages

City are still paying his wages even though he's AWOL? This can't be right.

I dont get this? Why is he being paid if he refuses to return?

As I understand it, the alternative to paying his wages is to cancel his contract - which would give Tevez exactly what he wants. Continuing to pay his wages will not rule out taking legal action against him.

On two other matters:

(i) Mancio is correct - and he was correct at the time: during the summer transfer window, a totally unrealistic 'market valuation' was placed on Tevez certainly by the media and, by most accounts, by relevant people at City (probably not including Roberto Mancini).

(ii) Those who continue to write as though Tevez has throughout been led by the nose by Joorabchian are deluding themselves. I have no time for Joorabchian and I hope that the affair rebounds badly on him. But Tevez has behaved in line with his own (complex) character.

 

[sunsudesura]

If we sell Tevez for £17m, WE ARE A FECKIN JOKE!! Tevez gets a good move - wins, our European rival AC Milan get a complete bargain - wins, we get royally fcuked - lose!! No other serious football club would sell a player of Tevez talent for such a low fee.

bullshit again. barca paid 45M+eto'o for ibrahimovic and just an year late they sold him at 20M

[bigimg]http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRDUY2pupK-lxWBJk3U60SMJAKDpSODah9tyirOFH0LLH3F1d3H[/bigimg]

This guy is the best dealer in Europe.
20 M for Ibrahimovic
16 M for Robinho
19 M for Tevez ( Maybe )
8 M for Thiago Silva
How much did he pay for Prince Boateng ?

Alberto Aquilani from Liverpool !

On the other hand City paid

32 M for Robinho
25 M for Tevez
25 M for Adebayor
17 M for RSC
............................etc

I kow City are on transition period and they have to pay above the odds most of the time, but I think we should learn from Galiani as well.

it must be said that some of these players were on a collision course with the companies belonging and were no longer part of projects, and must also be said that Raiola and Kia have done the heavy lifting ...

summer of 2006, Inter have blown fc Ibraimovic purchase, to Milan Galliani, in a conversation only