King Charles has cancer

I remember about 5 years ago a Professer of Cancer being asked what the biggest cause of cancer was.

His reply was getting older.
And yet isn't it true that some cancers have better outcomes after a certain age?
My mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 70. Went with her to all the appointments in the lead up to the diagnosis and I was crestfallen when they told her it had also spread to her bones.
Yet 7 years later she is still here, and that's AFTER refusing treatment at Christies (because she has always been a nutter). Seems she has just had tablets since then.
 
Last edited:
And yet isn't it true that some cancers have better outcomes after a certain age?
My mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 70. Went with her to all the appointments in the lead up to the diagnosis and I was crestfallen when they told her it had also spread to her bones.
Yet 7 years later she is still here, and that's AFTER refusing treatment at Christies (because she has always been a nutter). Seems she has just had tablets since then.
Possibly you are right, but the point he made was about cause of cancer which could also apply to your mum.
 
Harry flying back suggests to me it maybe a bit more serious than they are letting on, if it's been caught early I think a phone call or FaceTime to his dad would be sufficient, considering the relationship they seem to have at the moment. Or maybe he’s just been a decent son.
 
Possibly you are right, but the point he made was about cause of cancer which could also apply to your mum.
It's a weird one. I don't want people to think that being of a certain age always means that some cancers are less aggressive but I do think science indicates that they can be.
The women I've known that have had breast cancer when under 50, for example, have always had a more torrid time of it. One woman I knew died of it aged 42.
Maybe it's a hormone thing.
 
And yet isn't it true that some cancers have better outcomes after a certain age?
My mum was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 70. Went with her to all the appointments in the lead up to the diagnosis and I was crestfallen when they told her it had also spread to her bones.
Yet 7 years later she is still here, and that's AFTER refusing treatment at Christies (because she has always been a nutter). Seems she has just had tablets since then.
I think that for some cancers the slower metabolism of older people means it doesn’t spread as fast and people can go on for years with only a slow decline.
 
Harry flying back suggests to me it maybe a bit more serious than they are letting on, if it's been caught early I think a phone call or FaceTime to his dad would be sufficient, considering the relationship they seem to have at the moment. Or maybe he’s just been a decent son.

I'd go home to my dad if he had cancer of any form, he'd have to be a rapist or paedo for me not to.
 
It's a weird one. I don't want people to think that being of a certain age always means that some cancers are less aggressive but I do think science indicates that they can be.
The women I've known that have had breast cancer when under 50, for example, have always had a more torrid time of it. One woman I knew died of it aged 42.
Maybe it's a hormone thing.
Actually that may apply to other deseases.

My mum died in hospital after a stroke but a few years earlier she survived sepsis on 2 separate occasions.

I was told this was not unusual on much older people.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.