ManCitizens. said:
minimalistic said:
If you read my post properly you would see that I said 'lower' opposition which obviously does not include the likes of united, Chelsea, etc. There is no reason not to give the kids a chance occasionally if you're leading comfortably against a Wigan, QPR, or Aston Villa. Thats not going to hurt anyone and the kids will get some experience and confidence.
Even against those teams, if everybody's fit who you drop? If Aguero, Tevez or Dzeko were completely left out of a squad and Lopes was picked everybody would criticise Mancini for that.
These are exactly the problems facing the manager. Only against Villa were we ever "leading comfortably". Mancini had earlier played Razak and Suarez against Villa in a much changed team in the Capital One Cup and we had lost 4-2. He had brought Helan on as well. Against Watford he had brought Lopes on with a "comfortable" 2-0 lead, late on, and Lopes did well and scored. But picking a bench of kids in the sure and certain knowledge of a "comfortable lead" is a dangerous game for a club chasing trophies, especially when you look at the quality of those you could choose. The conclusion is clear; Mancini does not believe the "kids" are good enough yet. And I have to say that our academy is like other aspects of the club - developing. The position for "Kloppy" was different. He arrived at Dortmund in 2008 at a club only just getting over the near bankruptcy of 2005. He got through his first season but was dissatisfied with his team and went for youth. The point is that German youth development had been completely overhauled after the 200 euros, was on a different planet from anything in England and Dortmund were beneficiaries, having a group of excellent young players there who had been there since they were kids. City's academy was pale in comparison. Klopp has done an excellent job, but the lines of development were the only ones available to him and they were very fit for purpose.