gio's side step
Well-Known Member
Mancio said:
Aw, you too
Mancio said:
blueprint said:gio's side step said:It's simple enough to be concluded it's simple nonsense.
Because we have rich owners, doesn't mean we should just start to throw around arrogance, of it doesnt matter how much we pay for player, nor does it matter if he ends up being a top player or not. I'm ultimately basing my concerns of Kolarov and from watching him as a player. It is completely reasonable to also note, that 16 million pounds for a player who lacks pace in the PL and is always going to be problematic in that sense, and who has a license to waste possession by shooting when he deems it to be selfishly appropriate, not necessarily to the benefit of the team, is not justifiable.
Care to discuss the issue of his lack of pace?
His lack of pace can be offset here if he was covering Or being tight with Bent. All of us has prior knowledge that Bent is a prowler & has a knack for rebound goals.
So Kolarov here is rightly being slagged for the Goal.
That goes without saying PACE is important in PL.
gio's side step said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Your posts aren't getting worse. They are remarkably consistent.
The 'is it your money' point is a valid one. We are no longer at the point where 5 million on Samaras is our transfer budget wasted on one dud. I suspect whether Kolarov cost 16million or 6 million is not of material importance to our owners, rather his contribution to the team. On that basis you quoting his price adds nothing to the debate. Is that simple enough for you?
It's simple enough to be concluded it's simple nonsense.
Because we have rich owners, doesn't mean we should just start to throw around arrogance, of it doesnt matter how much we pay for player, nor does it matter if he ends up being a top player or not. I'm ultimately basing my concerns of Kolarov and from watching him as a player. It is completely reasonable to also note, that 16 million pounds for a player who lacks pace in the PL and is always going to be problematic in that sense, and who has a license to waste possession by shooting when he deems it to be selfishly appropriate, not necessarily to the benefit of the team, is not justifiable.
Care to discuss the issue of his lack of pace?
Amigo said:Read the whole thread, and I must say the OP is an idiot, Kolarov was superb yesterday and will continue to improve over the season as he had been doing recently. No doubt the OP will be making the Kolarov Appreciation Society thread in a month or two.
Come to the conclusion you must be a rag if you think kolarov had a bad game,idiot!gio's side step said:The wait goes on.
It's been a LONG time since we had a top left back at the club.
Bluemoon produces some ridiculous posts, but yesterday was quite sensationally ludicrous. Some people suggesting Kolarov had a good game. Fackin el.
Very poor defensively, and will score 1 out of every 20 of those long range shots he decides to take on every single time he has the ball in the final 3rd.
gio's side step said:Amigo said:Read the whole thread, and I must say the OP is an idiot, Kolarov was superb yesterday and will continue to improve over the season as he had been doing recently. No doubt the OP will be making the Kolarov Appreciation Society thread in a month or two.
'Superb'? Again, another example of the self deception city army
gio's side step said:Amigo said:Read the whole thread, and I must say the OP is an idiot, Kolarov was superb yesterday and will continue to improve over the season as he had been doing recently. No doubt the OP will be making the Kolarov Appreciation Society thread in a month or two.
'Superb'? Again, another example of the self deception city army