oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Re: Kolarov
For a full back he has no pace whatsoever and time after time thats what lets him down.As far as Clichy goes I have to agree with you that he does appear to have gone slightly backwards.However,he has far more pace than Kolarov,but I would prefer to see him play more as a left sided midfielder,as his crossing at times is something that Clichy aint got.
Looks like we`ll have to agree to disagree LB.
I`m trying to remember when Clichy has "cost us big time many times" as my learned friend pointed out ??
lancs blue said:oakiecokie said:TheProdigy2k9 said:He gets criticised because of his defence problems but look at how many times Clichy has cost us in a big game.
Kolarov, very rarely gets taken apart like Clichy does.
Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, You are a card !! He`s the fucking worst of the two full backs in that position as a defender.
Clichy had a very good first season with us but the last two have been very average and the fact that he doesn't contribute much going forward means it's no surprise that Kolarov has edged ahead of him. He may not be the greatest defender but at the same time I'd agree with the previous poster that he doesn't get ripped apart too often either.
For a full back he has no pace whatsoever and time after time thats what lets him down.As far as Clichy goes I have to agree with you that he does appear to have gone slightly backwards.However,he has far more pace than Kolarov,but I would prefer to see him play more as a left sided midfielder,as his crossing at times is something that Clichy aint got.
Looks like we`ll have to agree to disagree LB.
I`m trying to remember when Clichy has "cost us big time many times" as my learned friend pointed out ??