Chippy_boy said:
Why on earth cannot clubs puts clauses into players contracts that forbid them from talking to the media? Punishable by severe fines for any transgression.
Players have to understand how damaging this sort of shit is to the club's image and to team morale etc.
Can you imagine the shit you would get at work if you had given an interview to the daily mail openly criticising your employer and colleagues? I'd expect to be sacked to be honest. It beggars belief to me that clubs don't control this sort of thing better than they do.
In our case it's even more important. We are trying to build a worldwide brand and in so doing its vitally important that every aspect of how our club is presented to the public is properly managed. You cannot imagine the value companies like Shell and Apple place on their brand and the effort they put in to protecting and managing it. They simply would not tolerate any employees giving unauthorised interviews with the media.
And yet city seem to allow players to talk to who they like and say what they want? Utter madness.
Well, this has been a problem literally since the day ADUG took over - and yet we haven't managed to stem the flow of players taking their grievances to the press. We can slag the players off all day long - but at some point you have to ask yourself why it is that we are incapable of having a player leave the club on good terms. Maybe there's something we're doing wrong as well...
Certainly worth exploring when you have so many examples of players either whilst they are at the club, or the moment they leave, slagging things off at City...can't all be put down to the bitter ramblings of disgruntled ex employees ...