Kolo Toure [Merged]

Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

pee dubyas crayons said:
alera said:
Same here, big improvement on what we have at the moment. That would give us a back 4 of Richards--Toure--Lescott--Bridge with Zabs, Nedum, Upsons and Kompany as cover. Lescott can cover left back as well if needed thats a top 4 defensive line up for sure at least as good as Arsenal and Liverpools defensive pool IMO.

I would play Zab - Upson - Lescott - Bridge with Toure, Richards, Ned, Kompany as cover. But we need a new right back because Zab isn't top 4 material.
I think he is every bit as good as Rafael, Belletti, Boswinga, Arbeloa, Aurellio,

Might not be up there with Clichy, Evra, Glen Johnson and Cashley but he's as good as a few of the top 4's full-backs.

Don't forget it was his first season. I do wish he has a bit more pace but he's a very solid squad player.

I imagine full-backs is something we might look at in January or next summer if they look like they're a weak-spot.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

According to FM09 (PMSL!), Darijo Srna is an epic, LB/ RB, LW/ RW, maybe we should go for him?

;-p
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Bossman Blue said:
alera said:
So is this happening today or what ?

I am just glad we are getting another defender in, defence has been looking shocking again so far in pre season - all be it weakened and in friendly games. Still last season even without outr new signings we had the best attack outside the top 4 but easily the worst defence in the top 10 - so not hard to see what where ourt problem lie.

We cant go into the season with Ben Haim as backup its almost like he trys to let goals in....


A bit unfair. I know he was poor before he got loaned out but I thought that he had a reasonable game last saturday. You never know he might just show the form he had at Bolton and save us (ADUG ) a few bob.

He was mediocre at best and was a fault for the goal because of a shocking defensive header.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Calling that a defensive header is a bit kind. More like perfect assist !
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

pls hurry city.. i got tired of waiting.. is today possible??
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Blue4ever85 said:
Blue Coop said:
I find it stange how people would rather Upson than Kompany in the starting line up. Kompany is a fantastic defender and would be my captain next season with someone like Lescott or Toure alongside him in the middle. If we only sign one Centre Back, Onouha can fill in until Kompany is fit with Ireland as captain. Imo.

Not very good with the ball at his feet IMO and playing at the back, I think that would lead to a few fuck-ups.

Just a couple of seasons ago VK was in the top 30 defenders in the world(granted at no 30) but his mainstay is at centre half and seeing him ping 60yd balls to the feet of our own players was a joy to watch considering weve had Dunne blundering the ball out of defence for the past 5 yrs.Him,Ned,Lescott and Toure would be a great foursome at centre half.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

just check the OS, and nothing new there... wish there'll be one more signing this week..
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Lomas has a lob on said:
upson is a good player and better than we have but imo behind toure and lescott, and for me it would be lescott or upson, not both seeing as there both left footed, and play a similar role for there respective clubs!

back 4 of . . . . .zab toure lescott bridge
that back 4 ticks virtually ever box! with micah ned and kompany we have 7 players who will all keep each other on there toes!
lets get them in quick that way they can play in our remaining friendlies

IMO Zab is a poor right back, hes painfully slow and not very good positionally, although he is better with the ball than micah is. right back is a bit of a problem area in my eyes as we have zab, mich and ned (whos way better at cb) decent players but not great.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

brand blue heavies said:
Blue4ever85 said:
Not very good with the ball at his feet IMO and playing at the back, I think that would lead to a few fuck-ups.

Just a couple of seasons ago VK was in the top 30 defenders in the world(granted at no 30) but his mainstay is at centre half and seeing him ping 60yd balls to the feet of our own players was a joy to watch considering weve had Dunne blundering the ball out of defence for the past 5 yrs.Him,Ned,Lescott and Toure would be a great foursome at centre half.

Dont be worrying about Dunne, it's likely now he is on his way.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

TBH, id be playing Onuoha at RB.

Iv'e always thought that was his best potision. He's good with the ball and lightening quick so can bomb forward.
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Blue4ever85 said:
TBH, id be playing Onuoha at RB.

Iv'e always thought that was his best potision. He's good with the ball and lightening quick so can bomb forward.

is this a shit attempt at a Clarkie?
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

Rammy Blue said:
Blue4ever85 said:
TBH, id be playing Onuoha at RB.

Iv'e always thought that was his best potision. He's good with the ball and lightening quick so can bomb forward.

is this a shit attempt at a Clarkie?

I will never, ever, EVER, match Clarkie's post PMSL

:D
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

bluwes said:
I think he is bringing Toure in to play at right back.

Never thought of that but I think he would do well there as he has speed like hell good spot mate :)
 
Re: Toure agrees City move [Merged]

mike24 said:
Lomas has a lob on said:
upson is a good player and better than we have but imo behind toure and lescott, and for me it would be lescott or upson, not both seeing as there both left footed, and play a similar role for there respective clubs!

back 4 of . . . . .zab toure lescott bridge
that back 4 ticks virtually ever box! with micah ned and kompany we have 7 players who will all keep each other on there toes!
lets get them in quick that way they can play in our remaining friendlies

IMO Zab is a poor right back, hes painfully slow and not very good positionally, although he is better with the ball than micah is. right back is a bit of a problem area in my eyes as we have zab, mich and ned (whos way better at cb) decent players but not great.

I agree, Zab was absolutely brilliant back end of last season playing cdm, but as a right back he was positionally poor, I think Micah will come good this season, we've already seen what he can do
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top