thats a bloody good point tbhPrestwich_Blue said:The appeal has to be frivolous which this wouldn't be. If we were playing Liverpool next and they thought we were doing it just so he could play in that, then he'd get the extra game if the card was upheld. As we risk losing him it can hardly be classed as frivolous I would have thought.
blueinsa said:I honestly think dean will have a look and say he got it wrong as well.
Gabriel said:All this hot air on Sky about it being a red card from different angles when one clearly shows it was not. In other sports,when they use video evidence, they look for the one example which shows that the try was scored, the ball was caught, the serve was in etc. Why on earth do we have to see three obscure angles when one shows one foot leading and winning the ball.