He has played a hell of a lot of football and is suffering for it. Danilo is growing into our squad and should start ahead of him for now.
With England he is possibly losing ground to others. With Gomez and Alexander-Arnold fit you would probably have both in (1), Stones and Maguire as the other centre backs. I recognise both are currently injured but he isn't a certainty to start for England at RB or RCB. Trippier has had a worse season so he is probably ahead of him but Trippier has been excellent for England so probably gets some leeway for poor form with Spurs.
Rest him against Burnley too and hopefully he is back to higher levels against Newcastle. If not, with Mendy returning, Danilo has the right back slot. Better on the ball even if he hasn't the pace to get out of defensive difficulties. In general he is probably a better defender anyway (2) and Walker hasn't offered much end product this seaaon (3). Danilo has probably done more in the handful of games he has played.(4)
Some decent points there that I can get behind, except for:
(1) No. Don't let the media influence you too much. A decent number of Liverpool fans were starting to get a bit upset about Alexander-Arnold prior to his injury. Don't forget Gomez is a centre back now.
(2) I'd personally have it the other way around, I've always had Walker as the better defender and Danilo as the better attacker. Walker's ability to read play is underrated because of his physical prowess.
(3) When has Walker EVER offered much end product? He's always good for the odd assist and such but his role, at least for City has always been in the buildup rather than the finish. When you see him busting a gut to overlap it's more as a means of positional influence to stretch play more than anything. And he does that well.
(4) More how? Like more in his individual games than Walker has done in any individual game? I disagree but that's subjective, you could totally be right about that. But more for the season in total? That's not very fair.