Gabriel
Well-Known Member
Mendy is supposed to be that guy but can he even play 50% of the season?
You ask too much. ;-)
Mendy is supposed to be that guy but can he even play 50% of the season?
I love Kyle and was really displeased at the way we turned against him during his "trying times". I feel he is so very important to our very risky style. This explains why even Danilo cannot get in as good as he is.
However, I also feel attacking fullbacks that can go up and down with pace, can defend to a reasonable extent and CAN DELIVER BALLS ACCURATELY into the box is that missing link from our attack being great and being unplayable. Mendy is supposed to be that guy but can he even play 50% of the season?
Zinchenko is a tidy midfield type player not exactly the type of player I described above. If we have dangerous full backs, our attack goes up another gear. I am absolutely convinced about that.
Everyone knows that Walker is by far the better full back, all things considered.Walker is worth 4 of Zinchenko (at fullback).
Walker is worth 4 of Zinchenko (at fullback).
If this City team is to kick on, we need a better RB than Walker in terms of end product.
Everyone knows that Walker is by far the better full back, all things considered.
I think @supercity88 rolled out the stats to highlight the fact that Walker's attacking prowess isn't there yet. I sincerely believe that if we have dangerous fullbacks, our attack would become unplayable. Its a bit of a dilemma for us because we can hardly do without Walker because his pace bails us out ever so often.
Walker can't cross and most of the time he needs to have one extra touch on the ball before he even considering it. That's one asset he needs to work on as a RB.
Well we are short of goals.
There is always room for improvement.
We could first of all, try scoring more of the chances we do create, rather than putting the onus on Walker, to create more of them.
Agreed, we do miss an awful lot of chances. Why that is, I am not sure.
However, surely you must agree that there is room for improvement with Walker's crossing ability. Especially compared to Zinny & Mendy on the other side able to deliver with considerable more quality.
I often feel as if play slows down when it reaches Walker, giving the opposition the chance to get back in shape. With a more confident and technically able right back, I feel it would be beneficial for breaking down stubborn defences.
Walker has a problem imo, which is that we don't have a cf to get on aerial crosses & 99% of teams park a bus in the 6 yard box, so there is no space to get the ball through.
So he thinks about what to do, rather than just hitting it first time.
I don't disagree with this, definitely times we are missing an Eden Dzeko figure.
However, Liverpool aren't notorious for tall attacking players, yet still manage to find a way. Albeit, a lot of their goals are scored on transition, they do still manage to score from crosses where the defence is camped in.
We could first of all, try scoring more of the chances we do create, rather than putting the onus on Walker, to create more of them.
Not putting the onus on him to create them. Just saying there is room for that side of his game to improve. I believe Laporte has more assists than him too which gives an indication as to where his weakness is and where he should try to improve.
Maybe you are correct. Without Walker, Kompany and Fern, we'd be way below our level but my post was actually about exploring another dimension to our already great attack. If we had a fit Mendy on the other side (minus his occaisional defensive lapses), maybe it would be a tad better. But now we have minimal threat from our full backs.I watched Barca v Liverpool, & if they had Walker, they'd be in the final of the Champions League. That also goes for either of Fenandinho & Vincent Kompany.
If they'd had all 3, it would likely have been 0-0.