BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
So not a lot happened in the last 5,232 posts then
If Monaco was a person they would be so good at Poker[emoji23]
The bottle to turn down so much money for a player who has 2 years left on his contract, plus not knowing how good he will be next season or one bad tackle from a bad injury[emoji15][emoji854] Bravo Monaco
So not a lot happened in the last 5,232 posts then
trying to think how I was when I was 18. Real Madrid could come in five years when he's 23 yeah 23!
Teenage lads will want to be with their mates, we must have a big pull with Mendy and Silva.
Indeed.
Back to the whisky it is.
Wake me up in August.
For me it's the Gin
I can't help but think this is a smokescreen in order to get Barkley.
mbappe is as good as sanchez is right now imoI would take signing the best player (or at least top three) in the league over a guy whose played less than 50 games in france for a quarter of the price.
The club pretty much has to win the league this season after the past three poor ones and signing someone like Sanchez who is pretty much a no risk signing would go a long way to securing that title. The club needs instant success now so im not bothered about Sanchez age we would get two or three seasons out him. We have Sane and Jesus who are very young are gonna be superstars anyway. I think anything over a 100 million for Mbappe no matter how much is potential is utter madness even in todays market.
Lolmbappe is as good as sanchez is right now imo
Forget the statement aspect.
Everything flows from the football. I thiught he was spectacular last season. How many times do you need to see him before you're convinced. technique and pace like has, all the skills that he had on display against City and the other teams last season don't just vanish overnight. Our eyes weren't deceiving us.
I don't understand why there are quite a few fans saying "Oh it's too much". Would they say that about messi. This make more sense because of his age. Anyway, what we think is irrelevant. We'll get a barrage of abuse from other clubs but bring it on. I'd love to go into the Derby and Chelsea matches etc with him in the side.
Not interested in Sanchez. He's on a level with what we have. Mbappe on the other hand is a player who can bridge the gap. he's the type of player that teams like bayern, Real Madrid and barca have that in the big games win you matches. But we don't want him because he's too expensive? It's not our money is it. If City think they can spend £100m plus, and make it nack in spades then do it, and don't worry about it.
i dont get what is so funny....my guess is you watched him play against us with your eyes closed???
No doubt due to his age Mbappe is a better but but his ridiculous opinion that Mbappe right now is better than current sanchez is just being pure stupid.I probably agree with him. Out of the two, I would pick mbappe.
I probably agree with him. Out of the two, I would pick mbappe.
Wouldn't read too much In to a team that got beat by Iceland.My mind was made up after watching France vs England. I watched two very special talents that game, mbappe and dembele were streets ahead of everyone. England shit themselves every time mbappe got on the ball.
No doubt due to his age Mbappe is a better but but his ridiculous opinion that Mbappe right now is better than current sanchez is just being pure stupid.
Wouldn't read too much In to a team that got beat by Iceland.
We all know England are poor, but you can tell when you're watching a good footballer. If you can't see it then fair enough. If I was manager and I had to choose one out of the two to play for me, it would be mbappe. His pace is the main factor.
Except it's not because nobody quantifies Messi's talent by beating an England side do they? Especially an England defense that was all over the place... they are good but the defence against France was shambolic and not because "they made them look that way" they just were.its like saying messi isnt good because his team beat england.....just ridiculous