andyhinch
Well-Known Member
What's the reply looking like?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Lancashire CCC
- Thread starter es1
- Start date
andyhinch said:What's the reply looking like?
Looking a bit grim. All out for 134.
Bluemoonie92 said:tidyman said:Blue Punter said:1/4's are scheduled for 06-08 August.
Notts & Northants are group winners. Hants have 13pts from 8 games so likely to have a home tie as a group winner or as best runner up. If Hants win group, Surrey or Essex will be best runner up.
Just noticed Surrey play Essex after I posted, so one of them will have a better record than us , like you say.
Northants and London is a bit boring. A trip to Southampton appeals to me. Only ever been there once since they moved grounds.
fuck that, hampshire would hammer us. Ill take northants anyday.
A Surrey QF would be better money wise.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Corky said:Bluemoonie92 said:tidyman said:Just noticed Surrey play Essex after I posted, so one of them will have a better record than us , like you say.
Northants and London is a bit boring. A trip to Southampton appeals to me. Only ever been there once since they moved grounds.
fuck that, hampshire would hammer us. Ill take northants anyday.
A Surrey QF would be better money wise.
Knowing Surrey you'll end up at Chelmsford.
Bluemoonie92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 7,481
Oh FFS the worst possible draw, hampshire away.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
We get the one team that will be able to out bat us on our own pitch, shame, especially with us lacking all our star talent because they think it's intelligent to play this competition right in the middle of an Ashes series.
ECB are braindead, T20 should be done over a 4 week period, scheduled like the Indians and Aussies with all the star players free to play for the entire competition.
ECB are braindead, T20 should be done over a 4 week period, scheduled like the Indians and Aussies with all the star players free to play for the entire competition.
Worst draw possible I thought - but a return to Notts wouldn't have been welcome either.
Our last visit in to the Rose Bowl for a T20 QF saw a 9 wicket win for us. Hants had been playing well, and Warne captained them, however it was his first ever T20 game.
Our last visit in to the Rose Bowl for a T20 QF saw a 9 wicket win for us. Hants had been playing well, and Warne captained them, however it was his first ever T20 game.
Bluemoonie92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 7,481
Corky said:Worst draw possible I thought - but a return to Notts wouldn't have been welcome either.
Our last visit in to the Rose Bowl for a T20 QF saw a 9 wicket win for us. Hants had been playing well, and Warne captained them, however it was his first ever T20 game.
They have looked unbeatable in the shorter format in the last couple if years, but you never kniw with lanks. Knock them out and I would fancy us winning the while thing.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Bluemoonie92 said:Corky said:Worst draw possible I thought - but a return to Notts wouldn't have been welcome either.
Our last visit in to the Rose Bowl for a T20 QF saw a 9 wicket win for us. Hants had been playing well, and Warne captained them, however it was his first ever T20 game.
They have looked unbeatable in the shorter format in the last couple if years, but you never kniw with lanks. Knock them out and I would fancy us winning the while thing.
got beat by Kent of all teams this year so it shows on the day, Essex were huge favourites to beat us tonight and got stuffed despite us getting a below par score.
I'd say that the QF could well be the hardest game for Surrey, as if we got through to finals day we'd get KP and Trem back etc. I'd say with who we have available Hants and Notts are the strongest 2 followed by Somerset then Lancs, Durham, Essex then Surrey and Northants. Everyone at full strength I'd put us top 3.