The same Sky twats that asked Carlos whether he'd dived at Norwich even though they themselves had shown he'd clearly been fouled in the box. The score at the time was 0-0. It didn't matter as we won 6-1 but their anti-City bias was unbelievable. But there's no agenda, obviously.Don Karleone said:hertsblue said:I see they were so quick to bring the new retrospective punishment into play for utd after the Fulham game and this should have had retrospective punishment also but usual sky and FA. Sky runs football not the FA. as Sky did not show it 24/7 like they did with the utd one it never happened so nothing done about it.
Sadly all too predictable
Bang on the money.
no he didn'twarringtonblue said:Christ, remember the Mario incident with "Scotty" fucking Parker?
The ref gave a free kick for that but sky had it shown from every angle, on the hour, every hour ( ably assisted by that twat Brazil & fucking Irani on the radio) then hey presto he gets a ban
Thank you for contacting the Football Association.
Where the match officials have seen an incident it is considered to have been ‘refereed’ and therefore no retrospective action can be taken except for a case of exceptional circumstance. As a result, there is no requirement to review the incident, again, unless it is an exceptional incident.
The FA is only able to take any retrospective action on incidents not seen by the Match Officials which occur on the field of play and fall within Law 12 [serious foul play, violent conduct, spitting at an opponent or any other person, offensive, insulting or abusive language or gestures]. The FA may charge a player for committing an offense on the field of play within Law 12, not seen by Match Officials, but caught on video
Yes he bloody well did!es1 said:no he didn'twarringtonblue said:Christ, remember the Mario incident with "Scotty" fucking Parker?
The ref gave a free kick for that but sky had it shown from every angle, on the hour, every hour ( ably assisted by that twat Brazil & fucking Irani on the radio) then hey presto he gets a ban
A 4 match ban as well if you check, that Larsson tackle was disgraceful, it made me so angry that it's lucky it was Garcia he got, else I might have done myself damageIrelandSuperman said:Yes he bloody well did!es1 said:no he didn'twarringtonblue said:Christ, remember the Mario incident with "Scotty" fucking Parker?
The ref gave a free kick for that but sky had it shown from every angle, on the hour, every hour ( ably assisted by that twat Brazil & fucking Irani on the radio) then hey presto he gets a ban
bluemoon32 said:We didn't lose because of the ref, we lost because we were shit.
Mr Ed (The Stables) said:bluemoon32 said:We didn't lose because of the ref, we lost because we were shit.
Agreed, but Larson should have walked for that tackle, and then there was a two footed one on Zab late second half.
However we deserved to lose no question, but if Larson continues in this vein of "Living by the sword" one day someone will end his career good and proper!!
East Level 2 said:The same Sky twats that asked Carlos whether he'd dived at Norwich even though they themselves had shown he'd clearly been fouled in the box. The score at the time was 0-0. It didn't matter as we won 6-1 but their anti-City bias was unbelievable. But there's no agenda, obviously.Don Karleone said:hertsblue said:I see they were so quick to bring the new retrospective punishment into play for utd after the Fulham game and this should have had retrospective punishment also but usual sky and FA. Sky runs football not the FA. as Sky did not show it 24/7 like they did with the utd one it never happened so nothing done about it.
Sadly all too predictable
Bang on the money.