Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
No time to die
Well I did enjoyed it but it's a bit daft isn't it.
6/10
Well I did enjoyed it but it's a bit daft isn't it.
6/10
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Last Film You Saw
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
Last Night in Soho
Psychological horror that arcs in and out modern day and 60's London through the perspective of 2 girls whose lives start to unravel. The girls are played by Thomasin McKenzie and Anya Taylor-Joy, both of whom were excellent, the former in particular.
Definitely worth going to see if you haven't already.
7.5/10
Psychological horror that arcs in and out modern day and 60's London through the perspective of 2 girls whose lives start to unravel. The girls are played by Thomasin McKenzie and Anya Taylor-Joy, both of whom were excellent, the former in particular.
Definitely worth going to see if you haven't already.
7.5/10
Last edited:
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
It's on my list. I really like Anya Taylor Joy. She's gonna have a huge future. In a recent movie her name was Thomasin funnily enough.Last Night in Soho
Psychological horror that arcs in and out modern day and 60's London through the perspective of 2 girls whose lives start to unravel. The girls are played by Thomasin McKenzie and Anya Taylor-Joy, both of whom were excellent, the former in particular.
Definitely worth going to see if you haven't already.
7.5/10
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
The Hunt
2020
Not the really good film of the same name in 2016.
This one is pure shite, dont bother.
2/10
2020
Not the really good film of the same name in 2016.
This one is pure shite, dont bother.
2/10
Jumanji: The Next Level (2019)
Popular on Netflix at the moment. Don't think it was as good as the first re-boot, just one of those action-adventure movies you can have fun with, without taking it too seriously. Enjoyable and a bit daft, good 'popcorn movie'. To be fair the actors (once they go into the game) do a good job of portraying the person whose supposed to be playing them, if that makes any sense.
Probably going to be 3rd movie given the way it ended and wouldn't complain to be honest.
7/10
Popular on Netflix at the moment. Don't think it was as good as the first re-boot, just one of those action-adventure movies you can have fun with, without taking it too seriously. Enjoyable and a bit daft, good 'popcorn movie'. To be fair the actors (once they go into the game) do a good job of portraying the person whose supposed to be playing them, if that makes any sense.
Probably going to be 3rd movie given the way it ended and wouldn't complain to be honest.
7/10
Ilovehappyendings
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 617
Ladyhawke.
80's cheese. Quiet enjoyable.
Young Matthew Broderick, Michelle Pfeiffer and Rutger Haier.
6/10
80's cheese. Quiet enjoyable.
Young Matthew Broderick, Michelle Pfeiffer and Rutger Haier.
6/10
AlgarveBlu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2005
- Messages
- 3,930
Crikey that brings back memories , that just makes me feel really old - may give it a go again ;-)Ladyhawke.
80's cheese. Quiet enjoyable.
Young Matthew Broderick, Michelle Pfeiffer and Rutger Haier.
6/10
The French Dispatch. 7/10.
I think if you're not used to Wes Anderson films, this one might be a bit too much to swallow. I think Anderson may have out Anderson'd himself a bit, over egged the dead-pan pudding so to speak, at times having almost cliche-like qualities to it. It's got all the Wes Anderson signatures; beautiful colours, great sets and weird camera shots, dollhouse like buildings, dead pan characters, endless famous faces, snappy lingo and that strange lack of emotional depth (which i think some people really dislike without realising it's happening).
Anyway, my main gripe is the story which while clearly being set up as an anthology is a bit hollow. It's a series of shorts basically, hung around the concept of going through a fictional newspaper supplement so there' some padding in between the main 3 shorts. I dunno, I really appreciate the fact that not all films have to be shot in the same familiar style, so this is a welcome diversion from the norm, plus it's a nice idea for a structure but i think it doesnt quite come off. Some commentary on the creation of art is quite interesting but overall this is not Anderson at his best.
I think if you're not used to Wes Anderson films, this one might be a bit too much to swallow. I think Anderson may have out Anderson'd himself a bit, over egged the dead-pan pudding so to speak, at times having almost cliche-like qualities to it. It's got all the Wes Anderson signatures; beautiful colours, great sets and weird camera shots, dollhouse like buildings, dead pan characters, endless famous faces, snappy lingo and that strange lack of emotional depth (which i think some people really dislike without realising it's happening).
Anyway, my main gripe is the story which while clearly being set up as an anthology is a bit hollow. It's a series of shorts basically, hung around the concept of going through a fictional newspaper supplement so there' some padding in between the main 3 shorts. I dunno, I really appreciate the fact that not all films have to be shot in the same familiar style, so this is a welcome diversion from the norm, plus it's a nice idea for a structure but i think it doesnt quite come off. Some commentary on the creation of art is quite interesting but overall this is not Anderson at his best.
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
I loved his Moonrise KingdomThe French Dispatch. 7/10.
I think if you're not used to Wes Anderson films, this one might be a bit too much to swallow. I think Anderson may have out Anderson'd himself a bit, over egged the dead-pan pudding so to speak, at times having almost cliche-like qualities to it. It's got all the Wes Anderson signatures; beautiful colours, great sets and weird camera shots, dollhouse like buildings, dead pan characters, endless famous faces, snappy lingo and that strange lack of emotional depth (which i think some people really dislike without realising it's happening).
Anyway, my main gripe is the story which while clearly being set up as an anthology is a bit hollow. It's a series of shorts basically, hung around the concept of going through a fictional newspaper supplement so there' some padding in between the main 3 shorts. I dunno, I really appreciate the fact that not all films have to be shot in the same familiar style, so this is a welcome diversion from the norm, plus it's a nice idea for a structure but i think it doesnt quite come off. Some commentary on the creation of art is quite interesting but overall this is not Anderson at his best.
Bigg Bigg Blue
Well-Known Member
Just watched this and I would put it at a 9 out of 10.Last Night in Soho
Psychological horror that arcs in and out modern day and 60's London through the perspective of 2 girls whose lives start to unravel. The girls are played by Thomasin McKenzie and Anya Taylor-Joy, both of whom were excellent, the former in particular.
Definitely worth going to see if you haven't already.
7.5/10
Fantastic film